{"title":"Refugee dispersal in Denmark: from macro- to micro-scale analysis","authors":"Karen Wren","doi":"10.1002/IJPG.273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immigration and asylum has become a highly politicised policy area in Western Europe, where discourses resting on refugees as a ‘burden’ have prompted policy measures to disperse them. This paper examines the operation of refugee dispersal in Denmark using an integrated mixed-method approach. Macro-scale patterns are examined using statistical data, revealing that, at a national scale, the objectives of dispersal have been achieved, and refugees have been dispersed relatively evenly between regions, but at a regional scale, the reality has been different. In direct contradiction to the stated aims of the policy, dispersal has primarily been housing-led, and has occurred mainly in areas of relative social deprivation. Dispersal has effectively constituted a process of socio-spatial ethnic segregation. Micro-scale processes are elucidated through the use of in-depth interviews with a small number of refugees, which reveal significant isolation and social exclusion among dispersed refugees. There is also evidence that the policy, formulated within a culturally racist discourse in the public sphere, has also contributed to this discourse through the stigmatisation of refugees, a situation exacerbated by high levels of unemployment among the ethnic minorities generally. This paper therefore warns against the social engineering inherent within the conceptualisation of dispersal which, in effect, has resulted in the spatial segregation of refugees in areas experiencing pre-existing deprivation and social exclusion, and the inherent dangers that this entails in fuelling resentment and anti-refugee hostility. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":73472,"journal":{"name":"International journal of population geography : IJPG","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/IJPG.273","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of population geography : IJPG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/IJPG.273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41
丹麦的难民分散:从宏观到微观的分析
在西欧,移民和庇护已经成为一个高度政治化的政策领域,在那里,把难民当作“负担”的话语促使了政策措施来驱散他们。本文采用综合混合方法考察了丹麦难民分散的运作。利用统计数据对宏观格局进行了审查,结果显示,在国家范围内,分散的目标已经实现,难民在各区域之间的分散相对均匀,但在区域范围内,实际情况却有所不同。与政策的既定目标直接矛盾的是,人口分散主要是由住房引起的,而且主要发生在社会相对贫困的地区。分散实际上构成了社会空间种族隔离的过程。通过对少数难民的深入访谈,阐明了微观尺度的过程,这些访谈揭示了分散难民之间严重的孤立和社会排斥。也有证据表明,在公共领域的文化种族主义话语中制定的政策也通过对难民的污名化而助长了这种话语,而少数民族普遍的高失业率加剧了这种情况。因此,本文对分散概念中固有的社会工程提出了警告,这种概念实际上导致了难民在经历先前存在的剥夺和社会排斥的地区的空间隔离,以及由此引发的怨恨和反难民敌意所带来的内在危险。版权所有©2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。