{"title":"A case study illustrating traps, pitfalls and concerns for the hypnodontist","authors":"Gabor Filo DDS, ABHD","doi":"10.1002/ch.384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This case study is about hypnosis for intractable pain in the case of a patient who had trigeminal neuralgia, which through medical intervention had become anaesthesia dolorosa. The study will address the demand characteristics set up by the patient. Inherent in the demands were pitfalls and traps that ultimately resulted in a pyrrhic victory. This case illustrates the need to know the limits for the hypnodontist: of their jurisdictionally permitted scope of practice; their own abilities; whose goals are being met by the intervention; and what outcomes define success for the patient and the hypnodontist. Copyright © 2009 British Society of Experimental & Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":88229,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary hypnosis : the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis","volume":"26 3","pages":"173-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ch.384","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary hypnosis : the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ch.384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This case study is about hypnosis for intractable pain in the case of a patient who had trigeminal neuralgia, which through medical intervention had become anaesthesia dolorosa. The study will address the demand characteristics set up by the patient. Inherent in the demands were pitfalls and traps that ultimately resulted in a pyrrhic victory. This case illustrates the need to know the limits for the hypnodontist: of their jurisdictionally permitted scope of practice; their own abilities; whose goals are being met by the intervention; and what outcomes define success for the patient and the hypnodontist. Copyright © 2009 British Society of Experimental & Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
一个案例研究,说明催眠师的陷阱,陷阱和关注
本案例研究是关于催眠治疗顽固性疼痛的病例,患者患有三叉神经痛,通过医学干预已成为麻醉。该研究将解决患者设置的需求特征。这些要求中固有的陷阱和陷阱最终导致了得不偿失的胜利。这个案例说明了需要了解催眠师的限制:他们的司法许可的实践范围;自己的能力;其目标正在通过干预措施实现;对病人和催眠师来说,什么样的结果才能定义成功。版权所有©2009英国实验学会;临床催眠。John Wiley &出版;儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。