Response expectancies: a psychological mechanism of suggested and placebo analgesia

Leonard S. Milling
{"title":"Response expectancies: a psychological mechanism of suggested and placebo analgesia","authors":"Leonard S. Milling","doi":"10.1002/ch.379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Response expectancies, or the expectation of one's own non-volitional reactions to situational cues, are hypothesized to be a psychological mechanism of both hypnotic and placebo responding (Kirsch, 1990). In this study, response expectancies were evaluated as a mediator of suggested and placebo analgesia using Baron and Kenny's (1986) classic method of testing mediation. One hundred and seventy-two volunteers were randomly assigned to hypnotic analgesia suggestion, imaginative analgesia suggestion, placebo analgesia, or no-treatment control conditions. The hypnotic, imaginative and placebo treatments were more effective than the no-treatment control condition in relieving finger pressure pain. The hypnotic treatment was also more effective than the placebo. Each of the three treatments was partially mediated by response expectancies, although the percentage of mediation varied across the hypnotic (25%), imaginative (29%) and placebo (41%) conditions. The findings support the position that response expectancies are one of the major psychological mechanisms of suggested and placebo analgesia. Copyright © 2009 British Society of Experimental &amp; Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":88229,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary hypnosis : the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis","volume":"26 2","pages":"93-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ch.379","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary hypnosis : the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ch.379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Response expectancies, or the expectation of one's own non-volitional reactions to situational cues, are hypothesized to be a psychological mechanism of both hypnotic and placebo responding (Kirsch, 1990). In this study, response expectancies were evaluated as a mediator of suggested and placebo analgesia using Baron and Kenny's (1986) classic method of testing mediation. One hundred and seventy-two volunteers were randomly assigned to hypnotic analgesia suggestion, imaginative analgesia suggestion, placebo analgesia, or no-treatment control conditions. The hypnotic, imaginative and placebo treatments were more effective than the no-treatment control condition in relieving finger pressure pain. The hypnotic treatment was also more effective than the placebo. Each of the three treatments was partially mediated by response expectancies, although the percentage of mediation varied across the hypnotic (25%), imaginative (29%) and placebo (41%) conditions. The findings support the position that response expectancies are one of the major psychological mechanisms of suggested and placebo analgesia. Copyright © 2009 British Society of Experimental & Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

反应预期:建议镇痛和安慰剂镇痛的心理机制
反应预期,或一个人对情境线索的非意志反应的预期,被假设为催眠和安慰剂反应的心理机制(Kirsch, 1990)。在本研究中,使用Baron和Kenny(1986)的经典中介测试方法,评估反应预期作为建议镇痛和安慰剂镇痛的中介。172名志愿者被随机分配到催眠镇痛建议组、想象镇痛建议组、安慰剂镇痛组和无治疗对照组。催眠、想象和安慰剂治疗在缓解指压痛方面比无治疗对照组更有效。催眠治疗也比安慰剂更有效。尽管在催眠(25%)、想象(29%)和安慰剂(41%)条件下,调解的百分比有所不同,但三种治疗中的每一种都部分受到反应预期的调节。研究结果支持反应预期是提示镇痛和安慰剂镇痛的主要心理机制之一的观点。版权所有©2009英国实验学会;临床催眠。John Wiley &出版;儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信