The effect of direct mail framing strategies and segmentation variables on university fundraising performance

Paul D. Berger , Gerald E. Smith
{"title":"The effect of direct mail framing strategies and segmentation variables on university fundraising performance","authors":"Paul D. Berger ,&nbsp;Gerald E. Smith","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7138(199724)11:1<30::AID-DIR4>3.0.CO;2-#","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper provides guidelines to charitable marketers in general, and university fund-raising managers in particular, regarding the effects of direct mail framing strategies and direct mail segmentation variables on the performance of university fundraising efforts. Several direct mail framing strategies (factors) were empirically tested in a designed fractional factorial experiment that allowed the determination of not only the (main) effect of each factor, but also their interaction effects. These framing strategies included four factors: size of anchor (suggested donation), frame valence (whether a frame is expressed in positive vs. negative terms), and inclusion or not of two independent types of reference information. In addition, we studied the impact of the traditional direct marketing variables, recency, frequency, and monetary (RFM), as well as various demographic factors. Two performance measures were considered: 1) response rate, and 2) size of gift. Results indicated, among other things, that to a large extent the two measures are affected by different factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Direct Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7138(199724)11:1<30::AID-DIR4>3.0.CO;2-#","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Direct Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094996897707308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

This paper provides guidelines to charitable marketers in general, and university fund-raising managers in particular, regarding the effects of direct mail framing strategies and direct mail segmentation variables on the performance of university fundraising efforts. Several direct mail framing strategies (factors) were empirically tested in a designed fractional factorial experiment that allowed the determination of not only the (main) effect of each factor, but also their interaction effects. These framing strategies included four factors: size of anchor (suggested donation), frame valence (whether a frame is expressed in positive vs. negative terms), and inclusion or not of two independent types of reference information. In addition, we studied the impact of the traditional direct marketing variables, recency, frequency, and monetary (RFM), as well as various demographic factors. Two performance measures were considered: 1) response rate, and 2) size of gift. Results indicated, among other things, that to a large extent the two measures are affected by different factors.

直邮框架策略和分割变量对高校筹款绩效的影响
本文就直邮框架策略和直邮细分变量对大学筹款绩效的影响,为慈善营销人员,特别是大学筹款经理提供了指导。在设计的分数因子实验中,对几个直接邮件框架策略(因素)进行了实证测试,该实验不仅可以确定每个因素的(主要)效果,还可以确定它们的相互作用效果。这些框架策略包括四个因素:锚点大小(建议捐赠)、框架效价(框架是否以积极或消极的术语表达),以及是否包含两种独立类型的参考信息。此外,我们研究了传统直销变量的影响,最近,频率,和货币(RFM),以及各种人口因素。我们考虑了两个绩效指标:1)回复率,2)礼物的大小。结果表明,除其他外,在很大程度上,这两种措施受到不同因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信