Gene-environment interaction: overcoming methodological challenges.

R. Uher
{"title":"Gene-environment interaction: overcoming methodological challenges.","authors":"R. Uher","doi":"10.1002/9780470696781.CH2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While interacting biological effects of genes and environmental exposures (G x E) form a natural part of the causal framework underlying disorders of human health, the detection of G x E relies on inference from statistical interactions observed at population level. The validity of such inference has been questioned because the presence or absence of statistical interaction depends on measurement scale and statistical model. Furthermore, the feasibility of G x E research is threatened by the fact that tests of statistical interaction require large samples and their power is substantially reduced by unreliability in the assessments of genes, environmental exposures and pathology. It is demonstrated that concerns about statistical models and scaling can be addressed by integration of observational and experimental data. Judicious selection of genes and environmental factors should limit multiple testing. To overcome the challenge of low statistical power, it is suggested to maximize the reliability of measurement, integrate prior knowledge under Bayesian framework and facilitate pooling of data across studies by use of standardized stratified reporting. Consistencies and discrepancies among studies can be exploited for methodological analysis and model specification.","PeriodicalId":19323,"journal":{"name":"Novartis Foundation Symposium","volume":"26 7","pages":"13-26; discussion 26-30, 68-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novartis Foundation Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696781.CH2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

While interacting biological effects of genes and environmental exposures (G x E) form a natural part of the causal framework underlying disorders of human health, the detection of G x E relies on inference from statistical interactions observed at population level. The validity of such inference has been questioned because the presence or absence of statistical interaction depends on measurement scale and statistical model. Furthermore, the feasibility of G x E research is threatened by the fact that tests of statistical interaction require large samples and their power is substantially reduced by unreliability in the assessments of genes, environmental exposures and pathology. It is demonstrated that concerns about statistical models and scaling can be addressed by integration of observational and experimental data. Judicious selection of genes and environmental factors should limit multiple testing. To overcome the challenge of low statistical power, it is suggested to maximize the reliability of measurement, integrate prior knowledge under Bayesian framework and facilitate pooling of data across studies by use of standardized stratified reporting. Consistencies and discrepancies among studies can be exploited for methodological analysis and model specification.
基因-环境相互作用:克服方法论挑战。
虽然基因和环境暴露的相互作用的生物效应(gx E)构成人类健康疾病的因果框架的自然组成部分,但gx E的检测依赖于从在人口水平上观察到的统计相互作用的推断。这种推断的有效性受到质疑,因为统计相互作用的存在与否取决于测量尺度和统计模型。此外,gx E研究的可行性受到以下事实的威胁:统计相互作用的测试需要大量样本,而基因、环境暴露和病理评估的不可靠性大大降低了其效力。研究表明,对统计模型和尺度的关注可以通过观测数据和实验数据的整合来解决。明智的选择基因和环境因素应该限制多重测试。为了克服统计能力低的挑战,建议最大限度地提高测量的可靠性,在贝叶斯框架下整合先验知识,并通过标准化分层报告促进跨研究数据的汇集。研究之间的一致性和差异可以用于方法学分析和模型规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信