Information input overload, does it exist? Research at organism level and group level

Fredrik Bergström
{"title":"Information input overload, does it exist? Research at organism level and group level","authors":"Fredrik Bergström","doi":"10.1002/bs.3830400107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Continuous information processing is essential for any living system. A living system's chance of surviving is predicted by its ability to process information. Miller (1978) is one of the advocates of this idea. To investigate what happens when the amount of input information to a single channel is gradually increased, one experiment was carried out at two levels—organism and group—of living systems</p><p>Human subjects were instructed to solve simple mathematical problems in a given time interval. The time interval was decreased for each successive exposure which meant that the information input rate (bits per second) increased. The output rate was also identified. The subjects were male and female university students, who took part in a four-year study program in systems science, who had an age range from 20 to 29. The number of samples at the organism level were 7 and at the group level 5. I expected, according to Miller's theory, the output rate to increase at first but after a while to become constant. I also expected the groups to have a lower channel capacity than the organisms</p><p>The study indicated that the possible output rate is dependent on the living system's emotional reactions. A state of confusion occurred, at both levels, when the input rate reached a critical level. The output rate, at both levels, increased slowly after the state of confusion which agrees with the expected result, namely that the output rate after a while becomes constant The information processing issue might be more complex and full of nuances than was conceptualized by Miller.</p>","PeriodicalId":75578,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral science","volume":"40 1","pages":"56-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bs.3830400107","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bs.3830400107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Continuous information processing is essential for any living system. A living system's chance of surviving is predicted by its ability to process information. Miller (1978) is one of the advocates of this idea. To investigate what happens when the amount of input information to a single channel is gradually increased, one experiment was carried out at two levels—organism and group—of living systems

Human subjects were instructed to solve simple mathematical problems in a given time interval. The time interval was decreased for each successive exposure which meant that the information input rate (bits per second) increased. The output rate was also identified. The subjects were male and female university students, who took part in a four-year study program in systems science, who had an age range from 20 to 29. The number of samples at the organism level were 7 and at the group level 5. I expected, according to Miller's theory, the output rate to increase at first but after a while to become constant. I also expected the groups to have a lower channel capacity than the organisms

The study indicated that the possible output rate is dependent on the living system's emotional reactions. A state of confusion occurred, at both levels, when the input rate reached a critical level. The output rate, at both levels, increased slowly after the state of confusion which agrees with the expected result, namely that the output rate after a while becomes constant The information processing issue might be more complex and full of nuances than was conceptualized by Miller.

信息输入过载,存在吗?生物水平和群体水平的研究
连续的信息处理对任何生命系统都是必不可少的。一个生命系统的生存机会是由它处理信息的能力来预测的。Miller(1978)是这一观点的提倡者之一。为了研究当单个通道的输入信息量逐渐增加时会发生什么,在两个层面上进行了一个实验——有机体和群体生命系统。每次连续曝光的时间间隔减小,这意味着信息输入速率(每秒比特数)增加。还确定了输出速率。研究对象是参加四年系统科学研究项目的男女大学生,年龄从20岁到29岁不等。生物水平的样本数为7个,群体水平的样本数为5个。根据米勒的理论,我预计产出率一开始会增加,但一段时间后会保持不变。我还预计这些群体的通道容量会低于生物体。研究表明,可能的输出速率取决于生物系统的情绪反应。当输入速率达到临界水平时,在两个水平上都会出现混乱状态。两个层次的产出率在混乱状态后都缓慢增加,这与预期结果一致,即一段时间后产出率趋于恒定。信息处理问题可能比米勒所设想的更为复杂,充满了细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信