Investigating Elementary Teachers’ Views, Implementation, and Longitudinal Enactment of Nature of Science Instruction

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hallie Edgerly, Jerrid Kruse, Jesse Wilcox
{"title":"Investigating Elementary Teachers’ Views, Implementation, and Longitudinal Enactment of Nature of Science Instruction","authors":"Hallie Edgerly,&nbsp;Jerrid Kruse,&nbsp;Jesse Wilcox","doi":"10.1007/s11191-022-00343-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>During a 10-week professional physical science professional development (PD) course, elementary inservice teachers (<i>n</i> = 18) in a large urban district were engaged in explicit-reflective nature of science (NOS) instruction. Teachers were also explicitly engaged in reflection concerning NOS pedagogy (e.g., explicit-reflective, role of context). During the last 2 weeks of the PD course, teachers attempted to implement NOS instruction in their classrooms. Teachers submitted videos of their NOS teaching and written reflections about their videos. Then, 7 months later, teacher participants (<i>n</i> = 14) submitted videos of their science teaching. During the PD course, most teachers were able to implement effective explicit-reflective NOS instruction and their reflections indicated strong agreement between participants’ NOS pedagogical content knowledge and their enacted NOS instruction. 7 months later, just over one-third of participants continued to include explicit-reflective NOS instruction in their science teaching. NOS views, prior NOS pedagogical views, and prior NOS enactment did not account for longitudinal inclusion of effective NOS instruction. The role of teachers’ rationale for NOS and informal support networks are discussed.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":56374,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"32 4","pages":"1049 - 1073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11191-022-00343-1.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-022-00343-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract

During a 10-week professional physical science professional development (PD) course, elementary inservice teachers (n = 18) in a large urban district were engaged in explicit-reflective nature of science (NOS) instruction. Teachers were also explicitly engaged in reflection concerning NOS pedagogy (e.g., explicit-reflective, role of context). During the last 2 weeks of the PD course, teachers attempted to implement NOS instruction in their classrooms. Teachers submitted videos of their NOS teaching and written reflections about their videos. Then, 7 months later, teacher participants (n = 14) submitted videos of their science teaching. During the PD course, most teachers were able to implement effective explicit-reflective NOS instruction and their reflections indicated strong agreement between participants’ NOS pedagogical content knowledge and their enacted NOS instruction. 7 months later, just over one-third of participants continued to include explicit-reflective NOS instruction in their science teaching. NOS views, prior NOS pedagogical views, and prior NOS enactment did not account for longitudinal inclusion of effective NOS instruction. The role of teachers’ rationale for NOS and informal support networks are discussed.

Abstract Image

调查小学教师对科学本质教学的看法、实施与纵向制定
摘要在为期10周的专业物理科学专业发展(PD)课程中,对某大城市18名小学在职教师进行了显性-反思性科学(NOS)教学。教师也明确地参与了关于NOS教学法的反思(例如,明确反思,语境的作用)。在PD课程的最后两周,老师们尝试在课堂上实施NOS教学。教师们提交了他们的NOS教学视频,并写下了对视频的反思。然后,7个月后,教师参与者(n = 14)提交了他们的科学教学视频。在PD课程中,大多数教师能够实施有效的显性反思性NOS教学,他们的反思表明参与者的NOS教学内容知识与他们制定的NOS教学内容之间有很强的一致性。7个月后,超过三分之一的参与者继续在他们的科学教学中加入明确的反思性NOS教学。NOS观点、先前的NOS教学观点和先前的NOS制定并没有考虑到有效的NOS教学的纵向纳入。讨论了教师对NOS和非正式支持网络的理论基础的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science & Education publishes research informed by the history, philosophy and sociology of science and mathematics that seeks to promote better teaching, learning, and curricula in science and mathematics. More particularly Science & Education promotes: The utilization of historical, philosophical and sociological scholarship to clarify and deal with the many intellectual issues facing contemporary science and mathematics education.  Collaboration between the communities of scientists, mathematicians, historians, philosophers, cognitive psychologists, sociologists, science and mathematics educators, and school and college teachers. An understanding of the philosophical, cultural, economic, religious, psychological and ethical dimensions of modern science and the interplay of these factors in the history of science.  The inclusion of appropriate history and philosophy of science and mathematics courses in science and mathematics teacher-education programmes.  The dissemination of accounts of lessons, units of work, and programmes in science and mathematics, at all levels, that have successfully utilized history and philosophy.  Discussion of the philosophy and purposes of science and mathematics education, and their place in, and contribution to, the intellectual and ethical development of individuals and cultures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信