Efficient test to evaluate the consistency of elastic and viscous moduli with Kramers–Kronig relations

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS
Sanjeeb Poudel, Sachin Shanbhag
{"title":"Efficient test to evaluate the consistency of elastic and viscous moduli with Kramers–Kronig relations","authors":"Sanjeeb Poudel,&nbsp;Sachin Shanbhag","doi":"10.1007/s13367-022-00041-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The principle of causality constrains the real and imaginary parts of the complex modulus <span>\\(G^{*} = G^{\\prime } + i G^{\\prime \\prime }\\)</span> via Kramers–Kronig relations (KKR). Thus, the consistency of observed elastic or storage (<span>\\(G^{\\prime }\\)</span>) and viscous or loss (<span>\\(G^{\\prime \\prime }\\)</span>) moduli can be ascertained by checking whether they obey KKR. This is important when master curves of the complex modulus are constructed by transforming a number of individual datasets; for example, during time-temperature superposition. We adapt a recently developed statistical technique called the ‘Sum of Maxwell Elements using Lasso’ or SMEL test to assess the KKR compliance of linear viscoelastic data. We validate this test by successfully using it on real and synthetic datasets that follow and violate KKR. The SMEL test is found to be both accurate and efficient. As a byproduct, the parameters inferred during the SMEL test provide a noisy estimate of the discrete relaxation spectrum. Strategies to improve the quality and interpretability of the extracted discrete spectrum are explored by appealing to the principle of parsimony to first reduce the number of parameters, and then to nonlinear regression to fine tune the spectrum. Comparisons with spectra obtained from the open-source program pyReSpect suggest possible tradeoffs between speed and accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":683,"journal":{"name":"Korea-Australia Rheology Journal","volume":"34 4","pages":"369 - 379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13367-022-00041-y.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea-Australia Rheology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13367-022-00041-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The principle of causality constrains the real and imaginary parts of the complex modulus \(G^{*} = G^{\prime } + i G^{\prime \prime }\) via Kramers–Kronig relations (KKR). Thus, the consistency of observed elastic or storage (\(G^{\prime }\)) and viscous or loss (\(G^{\prime \prime }\)) moduli can be ascertained by checking whether they obey KKR. This is important when master curves of the complex modulus are constructed by transforming a number of individual datasets; for example, during time-temperature superposition. We adapt a recently developed statistical technique called the ‘Sum of Maxwell Elements using Lasso’ or SMEL test to assess the KKR compliance of linear viscoelastic data. We validate this test by successfully using it on real and synthetic datasets that follow and violate KKR. The SMEL test is found to be both accurate and efficient. As a byproduct, the parameters inferred during the SMEL test provide a noisy estimate of the discrete relaxation spectrum. Strategies to improve the quality and interpretability of the extracted discrete spectrum are explored by appealing to the principle of parsimony to first reduce the number of parameters, and then to nonlinear regression to fine tune the spectrum. Comparisons with spectra obtained from the open-source program pyReSpect suggest possible tradeoffs between speed and accuracy.

Abstract Image

用Kramers-Kronig关系评价弹性模量和粘性模量一致性的有效试验
因果关系原理通过Kramers-Kronig关系(KKR)约束了复模\(G^{*} = G^{\prime } + i G^{\prime \prime }\)的实部和虚部。因此,观察到的弹性模量或储存模量(\(G^{\prime }\))和粘性模量或损失模量(\(G^{\prime \prime }\))的一致性可以通过检查它们是否服从KKR来确定。当通过转换多个单独的数据集来构造复模量的主曲线时,这一点很重要;例如,在时间-温度叠加过程中。我们采用了一种最新开发的统计技术,称为“Lasso Maxwell Elements Sum of Maxwell Elements”或SMEL测试,以评估线性粘弹性数据的KKR顺应性。我们通过在真实和合成数据集上成功地使用它来验证该测试,这些数据集遵循和违反KKR。发现SMEL测试既准确又有效。作为副产品,在SMEL测试期间推断的参数提供了离散松弛谱的噪声估计。利用简约原则首先减少参数的数量,然后利用非线性回归对谱进行微调,探索提高提取的离散谱的质量和可解释性的策略。与开源程序pyReSpect获得的光谱进行比较,表明可能在速度和精度之间进行权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal 工程技术-高分子科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Korea-Australia Rheology Journal is devoted to fundamental and applied research with immediate or potential value in rheology, covering the science of the deformation and flow of materials. Emphases are placed on experimental and numerical advances in the areas of complex fluids. The journal offers insight into characterization and understanding of technologically important materials with a wide range of practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信