Contrasting patterns of phylogenetic diversity and alpine specialization across the alpine flora of the American mountain range system

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Hector Fox Figueroa, Hannah E. Marx, Maria Beatriz de Souza Cortez, Charles J. Grady, Nicholas J. Engle-Wrye, Jim Beach, Aimee Stewart, Ryan A. Folk, Douglas E. Soltis, Pamela S. Soltis, Stephen A. Smith
{"title":"Contrasting patterns of phylogenetic diversity and alpine specialization across the alpine flora of the American mountain range system","authors":"Hector Fox Figueroa,&nbsp;Hannah E. Marx,&nbsp;Maria Beatriz de Souza Cortez,&nbsp;Charles J. Grady,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Engle-Wrye,&nbsp;Jim Beach,&nbsp;Aimee Stewart,&nbsp;Ryan A. Folk,&nbsp;Douglas E. Soltis,&nbsp;Pamela S. Soltis,&nbsp;Stephen A. Smith","doi":"10.1007/s00035-021-00261-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although mountainous habitats contribute substantially to global biodiversity, comparatively little is known about biogeographic patterns of distributions of alpine species across multiple mountain ranges. Here, we present a detailed analysis of the distributions and phylogenetic affinities of alpine seed plant lineages across North, Central, and South American mountain systems. Using a large dataset that characterizes the elevational niches of American seed plants in a continuously valued way, we related the proportion of alpine habitat occupied by plant lineages to their biogeographic distributions at a regional scale and place these results in a phylogenetic context. We found alpine species diversity to be greatest in the central Andes and western North America, and that assemblages with lower phylogenetic diversity contained species with a greater degree of alpine specialization. In particular, near-Arctic/boreal alpine communities were characterized by low phylogenetic diversity and higher degrees of alpine specialization, whereas the opposite was observed for southern Patagonian communities. These results suggest that abiotic filtering alone in these climatically similar regions is unlikely to explain alpine community assembly. Nevertheless, the overall relative rarity of alpine specialists, and the tendency for such specialists to be most closely related to montane lineages, suggested that filtering was still an important factor in shaping alpine community structure. This work corroborates the importance of a nuanced and scale-dependent perspective on the ‘history-filtering’ debate axis, as both factors have likely contributed to modern biodiversity patterns observed in alpine plant communities across the Americas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51238,"journal":{"name":"Alpine Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00035-021-00261-y","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpine Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00035-021-00261-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Although mountainous habitats contribute substantially to global biodiversity, comparatively little is known about biogeographic patterns of distributions of alpine species across multiple mountain ranges. Here, we present a detailed analysis of the distributions and phylogenetic affinities of alpine seed plant lineages across North, Central, and South American mountain systems. Using a large dataset that characterizes the elevational niches of American seed plants in a continuously valued way, we related the proportion of alpine habitat occupied by plant lineages to their biogeographic distributions at a regional scale and place these results in a phylogenetic context. We found alpine species diversity to be greatest in the central Andes and western North America, and that assemblages with lower phylogenetic diversity contained species with a greater degree of alpine specialization. In particular, near-Arctic/boreal alpine communities were characterized by low phylogenetic diversity and higher degrees of alpine specialization, whereas the opposite was observed for southern Patagonian communities. These results suggest that abiotic filtering alone in these climatically similar regions is unlikely to explain alpine community assembly. Nevertheless, the overall relative rarity of alpine specialists, and the tendency for such specialists to be most closely related to montane lineages, suggested that filtering was still an important factor in shaping alpine community structure. This work corroborates the importance of a nuanced and scale-dependent perspective on the ‘history-filtering’ debate axis, as both factors have likely contributed to modern biodiversity patterns observed in alpine plant communities across the Americas.

美国山脉系统高山植物群系统发育多样性和高山特化的对比模式
尽管山区栖息地对全球生物多样性有很大贡献,但对多个山脉中高山物种分布的生物地理学模式知之甚少。在这里,我们详细分析了北美、中美和南美山区高山种子植物谱系的分布和系统发育亲缘关系。使用一个以连续估值的方式表征美国种子植物海拔生态位的大型数据集,我们将植物谱系占据的高山栖息地比例与其在区域尺度上的生物地理分布联系起来,并将这些结果置于系统发育背景中。我们发现,安第斯山脉中部和北美洲西部的高山物种多样性最大,系统发育多样性较低的群落包含高山特化程度较高的物种。特别是,近北极/北方高山群落的特征是系统发育多样性低,高山特化程度高,而巴塔哥尼亚南部群落则相反。这些结果表明,在这些气候相似的地区,仅靠非生物过滤不太可能解释高山群落的聚集。然而,高山专家的总体相对罕见,以及这些专家与山地谱系关系最密切的趋势,表明过滤仍然是形成高山群落结构的一个重要因素。这项工作证实了对“历史过滤”辩论轴的细致入微和规模依赖性观点的重要性,因为这两个因素都可能促成了在美洲高山植物群落中观察到的现代生物多样性模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alpine Botany
Alpine Botany PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
18.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alpine Botany is an international journal providing a forum for plant science studies at high elevation with links to fungal and microbial ecology, including vegetation and flora of mountain regions worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信