Comparison of microstructure and adhesion strength of YSZ and MSZ thermal barrier coatings in the presence and absence of Al2O3 interface layer

IF 1.9 4区 材料科学 Q3 Materials Science
Arash Mesbahzade, Seyed Hosein Razavi, Zahrasadat Seyedraoufi, Yazdan Shajari, Mohsen Samiee
{"title":"Comparison of microstructure and adhesion strength of YSZ and MSZ thermal barrier coatings in the presence and absence of Al2O3 interface layer","authors":"Arash Mesbahzade,&nbsp;Seyed Hosein Razavi,&nbsp;Zahrasadat Seyedraoufi,&nbsp;Yazdan Shajari,&nbsp;Mohsen Samiee","doi":"10.1007/s41779-023-00856-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present study, the APS process was used to coat Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, YSZ, and MSZ were applied on the surface of the IN738LC superalloy and NiCrAlY as the middle layer. The microstructure, porosity, and adhesion strength of these coatings were compared with the coating having the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> as the interlayer. Results showed that MSZ coating had less porosity compared to YSZ. Also, the presence of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> as an interface layer in the YSZ sample increased the porosity while in the MSZ sample the porosity decreased. With the presence of the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> layer, the size of the pores increased to the point that the largest porosity diameter in the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-MSZ sample was about 75 μm. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> showed highest adhesion strength (31 MPa) because of lower porosity. The high adhesion strength of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> can be attributed to diffusion and the formation of possible splats. The results showed that the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-MSZ sample had higher strength than Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-MSZ with about 28 MPa. MgO seems to be a better and cheaper stabilizing additive than Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","volume":"59 3","pages":"597 - 604"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41779-023-00856-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, the APS process was used to coat Al2O3, YSZ, and MSZ were applied on the surface of the IN738LC superalloy and NiCrAlY as the middle layer. The microstructure, porosity, and adhesion strength of these coatings were compared with the coating having the Al2O3 as the interlayer. Results showed that MSZ coating had less porosity compared to YSZ. Also, the presence of Al2O3 as an interface layer in the YSZ sample increased the porosity while in the MSZ sample the porosity decreased. With the presence of the Al2O3 layer, the size of the pores increased to the point that the largest porosity diameter in the Al2O3-MSZ sample was about 75 μm. Al2O3 showed highest adhesion strength (31 MPa) because of lower porosity. The high adhesion strength of Al2O3 can be attributed to diffusion and the formation of possible splats. The results showed that the Al2O3-MSZ sample had higher strength than Al2O3-MSZ with about 28 MPa. MgO seems to be a better and cheaper stabilizing additive than Y2O3.

Abstract Image

存在和不存在Al2O3界面层时YSZ和MSZ热障涂层的显微组织和粘附强度的比较
本研究采用APS法制备Al2O3,在IN738LC高温合金表面涂覆YSZ和MSZ, NiCrAlY为中间层。并与以Al2O3为中间层的涂层进行了显微组织、孔隙率和附着力的比较。结果表明,MSZ涂层的孔隙率比YSZ涂层低。此外,Al2O3作为界面层的存在使YSZ试样的孔隙率增加,而MSZ试样的孔隙率降低。随着Al2O3层的存在,孔隙尺寸逐渐增大,Al2O3- msz样品的最大孔隙直径约为75 μm。由于孔隙率低,Al2O3具有最高的粘附强度(31 MPa)。Al2O3的高粘附强度可归因于扩散和可能形成的片状物。结果表明,Al2O3-MSZ试样的强度高于Al2O3-MSZ试样,强度约为28 MPa。MgO似乎是一种比Y2O3更好、更便宜的稳定添加剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Publishes high quality research and technical papers in all areas of ceramic and related materials Spans the broad and growing fields of ceramic technology, material science and bioceramics Chronicles new advances in ceramic materials, manufacturing processes and applications Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society since 1965 Professional language editing service is available through our affiliates Nature Research Editing Service and American Journal Experts at the author''s cost and does not guarantee that the manuscript will be reviewed or accepted
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信