Dominant shrub species are a strong predictor of plant species diversity along subalpine pasture-shrub transects

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Tobias Zehnder, Andreas Lüscher, Carmen Ritzmann, Caren M. Pauler, Joel Berard, Michael Kreuzer, Manuel K. Schneider
{"title":"Dominant shrub species are a strong predictor of plant species diversity along subalpine pasture-shrub transects","authors":"Tobias Zehnder,&nbsp;Andreas Lüscher,&nbsp;Carmen Ritzmann,&nbsp;Caren M. Pauler,&nbsp;Joel Berard,&nbsp;Michael Kreuzer,&nbsp;Manuel K. Schneider","doi":"10.1007/s00035-020-00241-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Abandonment of pastures and successional shrub expansion are widespread in European mountain regions. Moderate shrub encroachment is perceived beneficial for plant diversity by adding new species without outcompeting existing ones, yet systematic evidence is missing. We surveyed vegetation along 24 transects from open pasture into shrubland across the Swiss Alps using a new protocol distinguishing different spatial scales, shrub cover of each plot (2 × 2 m) and larger-scale zonal cover along the transect. Data were analysed using generalized linear models of shrub cover, shrub species and environmental conditions, such as geology, aspect or soil. Most shrub communities were dominated by <i>Alnus viridis</i> (62% of transects) and <i>Pinus mugo</i> (25%), and the rest by other shrub species (13%). These dominant shrub species explained vegetation response to shrub cover well, without need of environmental variables in the model. Compared to open pasture, <i>A. viridis</i> resulted in an immediate linear decline in plant species richness and a marginal increase in beta-diversity (maximally + 10% at 35% cover). Dense <i>A. viridis</i> hosted 62% less species than open pasture. In <i>P. mugo,</i> species richness remained stable until 40% shrub cover and dropped thereafter; beta-diversity peaked at 35% cover. Hence, scattered <i>P. mugo</i> increases beta-diversity without impairing species richness. In transects dominated by other shrubs, species richness and beta-diversity peaked at 40–60% shrub cover (+ 23% both). <i>A. viridis</i> reduced species richness in a larger area around the shrubs than <i>P. mugo</i>. Therefore, effects of shrub encroachment on plant diversity cannot be generalized and depend on dominant shrub species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51238,"journal":{"name":"Alpine Botany","volume":"130 2","pages":"141 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00035-020-00241-8","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpine Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00035-020-00241-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abandonment of pastures and successional shrub expansion are widespread in European mountain regions. Moderate shrub encroachment is perceived beneficial for plant diversity by adding new species without outcompeting existing ones, yet systematic evidence is missing. We surveyed vegetation along 24 transects from open pasture into shrubland across the Swiss Alps using a new protocol distinguishing different spatial scales, shrub cover of each plot (2 × 2 m) and larger-scale zonal cover along the transect. Data were analysed using generalized linear models of shrub cover, shrub species and environmental conditions, such as geology, aspect or soil. Most shrub communities were dominated by Alnus viridis (62% of transects) and Pinus mugo (25%), and the rest by other shrub species (13%). These dominant shrub species explained vegetation response to shrub cover well, without need of environmental variables in the model. Compared to open pasture, A. viridis resulted in an immediate linear decline in plant species richness and a marginal increase in beta-diversity (maximally + 10% at 35% cover). Dense A. viridis hosted 62% less species than open pasture. In P. mugo, species richness remained stable until 40% shrub cover and dropped thereafter; beta-diversity peaked at 35% cover. Hence, scattered P. mugo increases beta-diversity without impairing species richness. In transects dominated by other shrubs, species richness and beta-diversity peaked at 40–60% shrub cover (+ 23% both). A. viridis reduced species richness in a larger area around the shrubs than P. mugo. Therefore, effects of shrub encroachment on plant diversity cannot be generalized and depend on dominant shrub species.

优势灌木物种是亚高山牧场灌木样带植物物种多样性的有力预测因子
在欧洲山区,牧场的废弃和灌木的连续扩张十分普遍。适度的灌木侵占被认为有利于植物多样性,因为它增加了新物种,而没有超过现有物种,但缺乏系统的证据。我们使用一种新的方案,对瑞士阿尔卑斯山从开阔牧场到灌木林的24个样带的植被进行了调查,区分了不同的空间尺度,每个样地的灌木覆盖率(2 × 2m)和沿样带的更大尺度地带覆盖。使用灌木覆盖、灌木物种和环境条件(如地质、地貌或土壤)的广义线性模型对数据进行了分析。大多数灌木群落以绿色Alnus viridis(占样带的62%)和木松(25%)为主,其余为其他灌木物种(13%)。这些优势灌木物种很好地解释了植被对灌木覆盖的响应,模型中不需要环境变量。与露天牧场相比,绿色A.viridis导致植物物种丰富度立即线性下降,β多样性边际增加(最大 + 覆盖率为35%时为10%)。密集的绿色A.viridis的物种比开放牧场少62%。在P.mugo中,物种丰富度在灌木覆盖率达到40%之前保持稳定,此后有所下降;β多样性在覆盖率达到35%时达到峰值。因此,分散的P.mugo在不损害物种丰富度的情况下增加了β多样性。在以其他灌木为主的样带中,物种丰富度和β多样性在灌木覆盖率为40-60%时达到峰值(+ 23%)。与P.mugo相比,A.viridis降低了灌木周围更大区域的物种丰富度。因此,灌木入侵对植物多样性的影响不能被概括,而是取决于优势灌木物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alpine Botany
Alpine Botany PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
18.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alpine Botany is an international journal providing a forum for plant science studies at high elevation with links to fungal and microbial ecology, including vegetation and flora of mountain regions worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信