Combining Milpa and Push-Pull Technology for sustainable food production in smallholder agriculture. A review

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Felipe Librán-Embid, Adewole Olagoke, Emily A. Martin
{"title":"Combining Milpa and Push-Pull Technology for sustainable food production in smallholder agriculture. A review","authors":"Felipe Librán-Embid,&nbsp;Adewole Olagoke,&nbsp;Emily A. Martin","doi":"10.1007/s13593-023-00896-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Achieving food security remains a pressing challenge for small-scale farmers, especially in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Ongoing climate change, invasive noxious weeds, and crop pests further exacerbate the situation. Optimizing traditional cropping systems for sustainable yields and climate-resilient production is imperative in order to address this challenge. The pre-Columbian <i>milpa</i> system of intercropping maize with companion crops such as beans (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>) and squash (<i>Cucurbita</i> spp.) is one effective system that has been shown to produce outstanding yields per unit area compared to monoculture systems. The Push-Pull Technology developed in East Africa, based on the use of repellent and trap companion plants intercropped with maize (and to a lesser extent sorghum), is seen to be similarly effective in minimizing the impact of major pests on yields, including striga weed (<i>Striga</i> spp.), maize stemborers, and the fall armyworm (<i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i>). Although both systems have the potential to compensate for each other’s limitations, there has been no cross-system learning between the Mesoamerican <i>milpa</i> and the East African Push-Pull Technology. Here, we review both systems and present the advantages likely to be obtained by combining these technologies in small-scale farming. The proposed <i>milpa push-pull</i> system could adapt to different gradients of altitude, rainfall, and soil nutrient levels, in addition to controlling pests, and therefore has the potential to become a fundamental cropping technique in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00896-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00896-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving food security remains a pressing challenge for small-scale farmers, especially in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Ongoing climate change, invasive noxious weeds, and crop pests further exacerbate the situation. Optimizing traditional cropping systems for sustainable yields and climate-resilient production is imperative in order to address this challenge. The pre-Columbian milpa system of intercropping maize with companion crops such as beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and squash (Cucurbita spp.) is one effective system that has been shown to produce outstanding yields per unit area compared to monoculture systems. The Push-Pull Technology developed in East Africa, based on the use of repellent and trap companion plants intercropped with maize (and to a lesser extent sorghum), is seen to be similarly effective in minimizing the impact of major pests on yields, including striga weed (Striga spp.), maize stemborers, and the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda). Although both systems have the potential to compensate for each other’s limitations, there has been no cross-system learning between the Mesoamerican milpa and the East African Push-Pull Technology. Here, we review both systems and present the advantages likely to be obtained by combining these technologies in small-scale farming. The proposed milpa push-pull system could adapt to different gradients of altitude, rainfall, and soil nutrient levels, in addition to controlling pests, and therefore has the potential to become a fundamental cropping technique in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa.

Abstract Image

结合Milpa和推拉技术,实现小农户农业的可持续粮食生产。综述
实现粮食安全仍然是小规模农民面临的紧迫挑战,特别是在撒哈拉以南非洲和拉丁美洲。持续的气候变化、入侵性有害杂草和作物害虫进一步加剧了这种情况。为了应对这一挑战,优化传统种植系统以实现可持续产量和气候适应性生产至关重要。前哥伦布时期玉米与豆类(Phaseolus vulgaris)和南瓜(Cucurbita spp.)等配套作物间作的milpa系统是一种有效的系统,与单一栽培系统相比,该系统的单位面积产量显著。在东非开发的推拉技术基于与玉米(以及在较小程度上与高粱)间作的驱蚊和诱捕伴侣植物的使用,被认为在最大限度地减少主要害虫对产量的影响方面同样有效,包括striga杂草(striga spp.)、玉米蛀虫和秋粘虫(草地贪夜蛾)。尽管这两个系统都有潜力弥补彼此的局限性,但中美洲milpa和东非推拉技术之间还没有跨系统学习。在这里,我们回顾了这两个系统,并介绍了在小规模农业中结合这些技术可能获得的优势。所提出的milpa推拉系统除了可以控制害虫外,还可以适应不同的海拔梯度、降雨量和土壤营养水平,因此有可能成为拉丁美洲和撒哈拉以南非洲的一种基本种植技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信