A Comparative Assessment of the Some Commercially Available Portable Bipolar Air Ionizers Particulate Pollutants (PM2.5, PM10) Removal Efficacies and Potential Byproduct Ozone Emission
{"title":"A Comparative Assessment of the Some Commercially Available Portable Bipolar Air Ionizers Particulate Pollutants (PM2.5, PM10) Removal Efficacies and Potential Byproduct Ozone Emission","authors":"Nishant Gupta, Ashok Kumar Agarwal, Rajeev Singhal, Sanjay Kumar Jindal","doi":"10.1007/s41810-023-00182-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Indoor air cleaning interventions such as bipolar air ionizers have increased lately due to rampant air pollution and the COVID-19 pandemic. Hitherto, the bipolar air ionizer efficacy against particulate pollutants and byproduct ozone emission has not been fully understood and remained a critical concern. Currently, available diverse and complex methods are insufficient to determine commercially available bipolar air ionizer reliability. The National and International market of bipolar air ionizers is proliferating, while safety standards and information are comparatively limited, in such cases, any misleading information by manufacturers could be detrimental to consumers. To focus on those gaps, the present study comprised five different types of commercially available bipolar air ionizers labeled as BAI 1, BAI2, BAI3, BAI4, and BAI5, which were examined against the most concerned indoor particulate pollutants and potential byproduct ozone. Seven days of consecutive experiments were performed in five acrylic boxes, each box assembled with a testing bipolar ionizer model, calibrated air quality monitor, and particulate pollutant source (incense sticks). Two runs/day for each individual bipolar ionizer were performed for up to seven consecutive days. Overall performance was procured from the daily cumulative arithmetic average. All tested bipolar air ionizers models showed notable, up to 80% particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>) removal efficiencies. The highest particulate matter removal was associated with bipolar air ionizers model 4 (PM<sub>10</sub> 79.7%, PM<sub>2.5</sub> 80.4%) and the minimum with BAI model 5 (PM<sub>10</sub> 72.2%, PM<sub>2.5</sub> 72.3%). Abnormal ozone emission was not observed with any bipolar air ionizer conduction in this study. Almost negligible elevation in background temperature (0.4 °C) and relative humidity (0.6%) were also observed. In conclusion, bipolar air ionizers could be byproduct ozone-free, indoor particulate matter removal, and low maintenance indoor air cleaning option.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36991,"journal":{"name":"Aerosol Science and Engineering","volume":"7 3","pages":"315 - 324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerosol Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41810-023-00182-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Indoor air cleaning interventions such as bipolar air ionizers have increased lately due to rampant air pollution and the COVID-19 pandemic. Hitherto, the bipolar air ionizer efficacy against particulate pollutants and byproduct ozone emission has not been fully understood and remained a critical concern. Currently, available diverse and complex methods are insufficient to determine commercially available bipolar air ionizer reliability. The National and International market of bipolar air ionizers is proliferating, while safety standards and information are comparatively limited, in such cases, any misleading information by manufacturers could be detrimental to consumers. To focus on those gaps, the present study comprised five different types of commercially available bipolar air ionizers labeled as BAI 1, BAI2, BAI3, BAI4, and BAI5, which were examined against the most concerned indoor particulate pollutants and potential byproduct ozone. Seven days of consecutive experiments were performed in five acrylic boxes, each box assembled with a testing bipolar ionizer model, calibrated air quality monitor, and particulate pollutant source (incense sticks). Two runs/day for each individual bipolar ionizer were performed for up to seven consecutive days. Overall performance was procured from the daily cumulative arithmetic average. All tested bipolar air ionizers models showed notable, up to 80% particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) removal efficiencies. The highest particulate matter removal was associated with bipolar air ionizers model 4 (PM10 79.7%, PM2.5 80.4%) and the minimum with BAI model 5 (PM10 72.2%, PM2.5 72.3%). Abnormal ozone emission was not observed with any bipolar air ionizer conduction in this study. Almost negligible elevation in background temperature (0.4 °C) and relative humidity (0.6%) were also observed. In conclusion, bipolar air ionizers could be byproduct ozone-free, indoor particulate matter removal, and low maintenance indoor air cleaning option.
期刊介绍:
ASE is an international journal that publishes high-quality papers, communications, and discussion that advance aerosol science and engineering. Acceptable article forms include original research papers, review articles, letters, commentaries, news and views, research highlights, editorials, correspondence, and new-direction columns. ASE emphasizes the application of aerosol technology to both environmental and technical issues, and it provides a platform not only for basic research but also for industrial interests. We encourage scientists and researchers to submit papers that will advance our knowledge of aerosols and highlight new approaches for aerosol studies and new technologies for pollution control. ASE promotes cutting-edge studies of aerosol science and state-of-art instrumentation, but it is not limited to academic topics and instead aims to bridge the gap between basic science and industrial applications. ASE accepts papers covering a broad range of aerosol-related topics, including aerosol physical and chemical properties, composition, formation, transport and deposition, numerical simulation of air pollution incidents, chemical processes in the atmosphere, aerosol control technologies and industrial applications. In addition, ASE welcomes papers involving new and advanced methods and technologies that focus on aerosol pollution, sampling and analysis, including the invention and development of instrumentation, nanoparticle formation, nano technology, indoor and outdoor air quality monitoring, air pollution control, and air pollution remediation and feasibility assessments.