Flowering phenology in alpine grassland strongly responds to shifts in snowmelt but weakly to summer drought

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Maria Vorkauf, Ansgar Kahmen, Christian Körner, Erika Hiltbrunner
{"title":"Flowering phenology in alpine grassland strongly responds to shifts in snowmelt but weakly to summer drought","authors":"Maria Vorkauf,&nbsp;Ansgar Kahmen,&nbsp;Christian Körner,&nbsp;Erika Hiltbrunner","doi":"10.1007/s00035-021-00252-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Alpine plants complete their seasonal phenological cycle during two to three snow-free months. Under climate change, snowmelt advances and the risk of summer droughts increases. Yet, photoperiodism may prevent alpine plants from benefiting from an earlier start of the growing season. To identify the drivers of flowering phenology in the seven main species of an alpine grassland, we experimentally shifted the snowmelt date through snow manipulations, and excluded precipitation during summer. With “time-to-event” models, we analysed the beginning of main flowering with respect to temperature sums, time after snowmelt, and calendar day (photoperiod). We identified two phenology types: four species tracking snowmelt dates directly or with a certain lag set by temperature sums, including the dominant sedge <i>Carex curvula</i>, <i>Anthoxanthum alpinum Helictotrichon versicolor</i>, and <i>Trifolium alpinum</i>, and three species tracking photoperiod: <i>Geum montanum</i>, <i>Leontodon helveticus</i> and <i>Potentilla aurea</i>. Photoperiodism did not act as daylength threshold but rather modulated the thermal sums at flowering. Hence, photoperiod delayed flowering after earlier snowmelt. The grass <i>A. alpinum</i> was the only one of seven species that clearly responded to drought by earlier and longer flowering. The remarkably high importance of snowmelt dates for both phenology types suggests an earlier onset of flowering in a warmer climate, particularly for non-photoperiod-sensitive species, with an increasing risk for freezing damages and potential disruptions of biotic interactions in the most frequent type of alpine grassland across the Alps. Consequentially, the distinct microclimate and species-specific responses to photoperiod challenge temperature-only based projections of climate warming effects on alpine plant species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00035-021-00252-z","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00035-021-00252-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Alpine plants complete their seasonal phenological cycle during two to three snow-free months. Under climate change, snowmelt advances and the risk of summer droughts increases. Yet, photoperiodism may prevent alpine plants from benefiting from an earlier start of the growing season. To identify the drivers of flowering phenology in the seven main species of an alpine grassland, we experimentally shifted the snowmelt date through snow manipulations, and excluded precipitation during summer. With “time-to-event” models, we analysed the beginning of main flowering with respect to temperature sums, time after snowmelt, and calendar day (photoperiod). We identified two phenology types: four species tracking snowmelt dates directly or with a certain lag set by temperature sums, including the dominant sedge Carex curvula, Anthoxanthum alpinum Helictotrichon versicolor, and Trifolium alpinum, and three species tracking photoperiod: Geum montanum, Leontodon helveticus and Potentilla aurea. Photoperiodism did not act as daylength threshold but rather modulated the thermal sums at flowering. Hence, photoperiod delayed flowering after earlier snowmelt. The grass A. alpinum was the only one of seven species that clearly responded to drought by earlier and longer flowering. The remarkably high importance of snowmelt dates for both phenology types suggests an earlier onset of flowering in a warmer climate, particularly for non-photoperiod-sensitive species, with an increasing risk for freezing damages and potential disruptions of biotic interactions in the most frequent type of alpine grassland across the Alps. Consequentially, the distinct microclimate and species-specific responses to photoperiod challenge temperature-only based projections of climate warming effects on alpine plant species.

高山草原的开花酚学对融雪变化的反应强烈,但对夏季干旱的反应较弱
高山植物在两到三个月的无雪期内完成其季节性的酚学周期。在气候变化下,融雪加剧,夏季干旱的风险增加。然而,光周期性可能会使高山植物无法从生长季节的早期开始中受益。为了确定高山草原七个主要物种开花表型的驱动因素,我们通过雪处理实验改变了融雪日期,并排除了夏季的降水。利用“时间-事件”模型,我们分析了主开花的开始与温度总和、融雪后的时间和日历日(光周期)的关系。我们确定了两种酚学类型:四种直接或通过温度总和设定一定滞后来跟踪融雪日期,包括优势莎草Carex curvula、Anthoxanthum alpinum Helicotrichon versicolor和三叶草,以及三种跟踪光周期的物种:Geum montanum、Leontodon helveticus和Potentilla aurea。光周期性不作为日照阈值,而是调节开花时的热量总和。因此,早融雪后,光周期推迟了开花。高山草是七个物种中唯一一个对干旱有明显反应的物种,开花更早、更长。融雪日期对这两种表型的重要性都非常高,这表明在温暖的气候中开花更早,尤其是对非光周期敏感的物种,在阿尔卑斯山最常见的高山草原中,冻害和生物相互作用的潜在破坏风险越来越大。因此,对光周期挑战温度的独特小气候和物种特异性反应仅基于气候变暖对高山植物物种影响的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信