A Comparison of PCA and LBF Based Multireceiver SAS Imaging Algorithms

IF 3.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Meng Wang;Pan Huang
{"title":"A Comparison of PCA and LBF Based Multireceiver SAS Imaging Algorithms","authors":"Meng Wang;Pan Huang","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3323593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multireceiver synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) is a useful tool to provide high-resolution images. The most important step lies in developments of multireceiver synthetic aperture image formation processors, which uses the sonar echoed signal as the input. The system transfer function is crucial in the development of signal processors. In order to use traditional imaging algorithms, the monostatic conversion transferring multireceiver SAS signal to monostatic SAS data is often conducted. A review and evaluation of imaging methods based on monostatic conversion is conducted in this article. The relationship of Phase center approximation (PCA) method and Loffeld’s bistatic formula (LBF) is firstly reformulated in theory. Considering facts that PCA and LBF methods are the approximation of exact system transfer function, the approximation error of both methods are firstly compared and evaluated by using the numerical system transfer function, which is considered to be the precise system transfer function. Since more approximations of PCA and LBF should be carried out to develop fast imaging algorithms, the actual phase error of both methods is compared and evaluated based on numerical system transfer function. Then, the imaging performance of both methods based on range migration algorithm (RMA) is further evaluated. At last, the relationships of both patent methods are comprehensively described.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"11 ","pages":"113272-113283"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/6287639/10005208/10278398.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10278398/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multireceiver synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) is a useful tool to provide high-resolution images. The most important step lies in developments of multireceiver synthetic aperture image formation processors, which uses the sonar echoed signal as the input. The system transfer function is crucial in the development of signal processors. In order to use traditional imaging algorithms, the monostatic conversion transferring multireceiver SAS signal to monostatic SAS data is often conducted. A review and evaluation of imaging methods based on monostatic conversion is conducted in this article. The relationship of Phase center approximation (PCA) method and Loffeld’s bistatic formula (LBF) is firstly reformulated in theory. Considering facts that PCA and LBF methods are the approximation of exact system transfer function, the approximation error of both methods are firstly compared and evaluated by using the numerical system transfer function, which is considered to be the precise system transfer function. Since more approximations of PCA and LBF should be carried out to develop fast imaging algorithms, the actual phase error of both methods is compared and evaluated based on numerical system transfer function. Then, the imaging performance of both methods based on range migration algorithm (RMA) is further evaluated. At last, the relationships of both patent methods are comprehensively described.
基于PCA和LBF的多接收机SAS成像算法的比较
多接收器合成孔径声纳(SAS)是提供高分辨率图像的有用工具。最重要的一步是开发多接收器合成孔径图像形成处理器,该处理器使用声纳回波信号作为输入。系统传递函数在信号处理器的开发中至关重要。为了使用传统的成像算法,经常进行将多接收器SAS信号转换为单站SAS数据的单站转换。本文对基于单站转换的成像方法进行了综述和评价。首次从理论上重新表述了相位中心近似(PCA)方法与洛菲尔德双基地公式(LBF)的关系。考虑到PCA和LBF方法是精确系统传递函数的近似,首先利用被认为是精确系统传输函数的数值系统传递函数对两种方法的近似误差进行了比较和评估。由于要开发快速成像算法,需要对PCA和LBF进行更多的近似,因此基于数值系统传递函数对两种方法的实际相位误差进行了比较和评估。然后,进一步评估了基于距离偏移算法的两种方法的成像性能。最后,对两种专利方法的关系进行了全面的阐述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信