Evaluation and control of opinion polarization and disagreement: a review

Q2 Decision Sciences
Yuejiang Li;Hong Zhao
{"title":"Evaluation and control of opinion polarization and disagreement: a review","authors":"Yuejiang Li;Hong Zhao","doi":"10.1108/IJCS-02-2021-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to review the recent studies on opinion polarization and disagreement. Design/methodology/approach – In this work, recent advances in opinion polarization and disagreement and pay attention to how they are evaluated and controlled are reviewed. Findings – In literature, three metrics: polarization, disagreement and polarization-disagreement index are usually adopted and there is a tradeoff between polarization and disagreement. Different strategies have been proposed in literature which can significantly control opinion polarization and disagreement based on these metrics. Originality/value – This review is of crucial importance to summarize works on opinion polarization and disagreement and to the better understanding and control of them.","PeriodicalId":32381,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Crowd Science","volume":"5 2","pages":"114-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/9736195/9826693/09826695.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Crowd Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9826695/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to review the recent studies on opinion polarization and disagreement. Design/methodology/approach – In this work, recent advances in opinion polarization and disagreement and pay attention to how they are evaluated and controlled are reviewed. Findings – In literature, three metrics: polarization, disagreement and polarization-disagreement index are usually adopted and there is a tradeoff between polarization and disagreement. Different strategies have been proposed in literature which can significantly control opinion polarization and disagreement based on these metrics. Originality/value – This review is of crucial importance to summarize works on opinion polarization and disagreement and to the better understanding and control of them.
意见两极分化和分歧的评估和控制:综述
目的——本文的目的是回顾最近关于意见两极分化和分歧的研究。设计/方法/方法——在这项工作中,回顾了意见两极分化和分歧的最新进展,以及对如何评估和控制它们的关注。研究结果——在文献中,通常采用三个指标:极化、分歧和极化分歧指数,极化和分歧之间存在权衡。文献中提出了不同的策略,可以根据这些指标显著控制意见两极分化和分歧。原创性/价值——这篇综述对于总结关于意见两极分化和分歧的工作以及更好地理解和控制它们至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Crowd Science
International Journal of Crowd Science Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信