Risk-Based Security Measure Allocation Against Actuator Attacks

Sribalaji C. Anand;André M. H. Teixeira
{"title":"Risk-Based Security Measure Allocation Against Actuator Attacks","authors":"Sribalaji C. Anand;André M. H. Teixeira","doi":"10.1109/OJCSYS.2023.3305831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the problem of risk-optimal allocation of security measures when the actuators of an uncertain control system are under attack. We consider an adversary injecting false data into the actuator channels. The attack impact is characterized by the maximum performance loss caused by a stealthy adversary with bounded energy. Since the impact is a random variable, due to system uncertainty, we use Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) to characterize the risk associated with the attack. We then consider the problem of allocating security measures to the set of actuators to minimize the risk. We assume that there are only a limited number of security measures available. Under this constraint, we observe that the allocation problem is a mixed-integer optimization problem. Thus we use relaxation techniques to approximate the security allocation problem into a Semi-Definite Program (SDP). We also compare our allocation method \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$(i)$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n across different risk measures: the worst-case measure, the average (nominal) measure, and \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$(ii)$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n across different search algorithms: the exhaustive and the greedy search algorithms. We depict the efficacy of our approach through numerical examples.","PeriodicalId":73299,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of control systems","volume":"2 ","pages":"297-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/9552933/9973428/10221684.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of control systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10221684/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the problem of risk-optimal allocation of security measures when the actuators of an uncertain control system are under attack. We consider an adversary injecting false data into the actuator channels. The attack impact is characterized by the maximum performance loss caused by a stealthy adversary with bounded energy. Since the impact is a random variable, due to system uncertainty, we use Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) to characterize the risk associated with the attack. We then consider the problem of allocating security measures to the set of actuators to minimize the risk. We assume that there are only a limited number of security measures available. Under this constraint, we observe that the allocation problem is a mixed-integer optimization problem. Thus we use relaxation techniques to approximate the security allocation problem into a Semi-Definite Program (SDP). We also compare our allocation method $(i)$ across different risk measures: the worst-case measure, the average (nominal) measure, and $(ii)$ across different search algorithms: the exhaustive and the greedy search algorithms. We depict the efficacy of our approach through numerical examples.
针对执行器攻击的基于风险的安全措施分配
本文研究了不确定控制系统执行器受到攻击时安全措施的风险最优分配问题。我们考虑对手将虚假数据注入致动器通道。攻击冲击的特点是由具有有限能量的隐形对手造成的最大性能损失。由于影响是一个随机变量,由于系统的不确定性,我们使用条件风险值(CVaR)来表征与攻击相关的风险。然后,我们考虑将安全措施分配给执行器集以将风险降至最低的问题。我们认为,可用的安全措施数量有限。在这种约束条件下,我们观察到分配问题是一个混合整数优化问题。因此,我们使用松弛技术将安全分配问题近似为半定程序(SDP)。我们还比较了不同风险度量的分配方法$(i)$:最坏情况度量、平均(名义)度量,以及不同搜索算法的分配方法:穷举搜索算法和贪婪搜索算法。我们通过数值例子描述了我们的方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信