Accuracy and utility of blood and urine biomarkers for the noninvasive diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Wioletta Dolińska B.Sc. , Hannah Draper M.B.Ch.B. M.Phil. , Lara Othman M.B.Ch.B. , Chloe Thompson B.Sc. , Samantha Girvan M.Phil , Keith Cunningham M.D. , Jane Allen M.B.Ch.B. , Alan Rigby M.Sc. , Kevin Phillips M.B.Ch.B. , Barbara-ann Guinn Ph.D.
{"title":"Accuracy and utility of blood and urine biomarkers for the noninvasive diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis","authors":"Wioletta Dolińska B.Sc. ,&nbsp;Hannah Draper M.B.Ch.B. M.Phil. ,&nbsp;Lara Othman M.B.Ch.B. ,&nbsp;Chloe Thompson B.Sc. ,&nbsp;Samantha Girvan M.Phil ,&nbsp;Keith Cunningham M.D. ,&nbsp;Jane Allen M.B.Ch.B. ,&nbsp;Alan Rigby M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Kevin Phillips M.B.Ch.B. ,&nbsp;Barbara-ann Guinn Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfnr.2022.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Endometriosis is a chronic, incurable condition associated with debilitating pain and subfertility affecting over 190 million women worldwide, which has no reliable noninvasive diagnostic tool. We aimed to determine the state-of-the-art in noninvasive liquid biopsy biomarker detection and predict the most promising biomarkers for endometriosis detection.</p></div><div><h3>Evidence Review</h3><p>A systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using the PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Primary research studies examining blood or urine biomarkers in humans published in English up until August 2022 were included. Studies with more than 10 patients with clear methodology and surgical staging of endometriosis were included, whereas studies that included gynecological malignancies or who did not perform laparoscopy in the control group were excluded. The articles were assessed for the risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. One investigator extracted the data, and 2 investigators checked the accuracy. Extracted data were analyzed descriptively, the box plots of pooled data were calculated using RStudio, and the likelihood ratios were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 8,244 and 3,619 manuscripts for blood and urine biomarkers were identified. After screening on the basis of the title, abstract, full text, and quality assurance, 18 of these studies assessing blood biomarkers and 15 examining urine biomarkers were eligible for data extraction. However, there were inconsistencies in the results indicating that standardized techniques would be essential for direct comparisons to be made in the future. In 4 of the eligible studies, the urine biomarkers were juxtaposed with blood markers; however, in most cases, the combination of blood and urine biomarkers resulted in an increase in the area under the curve value, sensitivity, and specificity. One study presented biomarkers with a likelihood ratio of &gt;10. However, currently, none of the biomarkers have been shown to be clinically useful, and further research is necessary to determine their utility in clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Multiple biomarkers described here provide exciting avenues for further study particularly as part of diagnostic panels, including the endometrial antigens tropomyosin 3, stomatin-like protein 2, and tropomodulin 3, microribonucleic acids, and interleukins. There is a need for standardized protocols to be used to achieve consistent, reproducible results that will facilitate the development of a clinically applicable noninvasive test for endometriosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73011,"journal":{"name":"F&S reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666571922000214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

Endometriosis is a chronic, incurable condition associated with debilitating pain and subfertility affecting over 190 million women worldwide, which has no reliable noninvasive diagnostic tool. We aimed to determine the state-of-the-art in noninvasive liquid biopsy biomarker detection and predict the most promising biomarkers for endometriosis detection.

Evidence Review

A systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using the PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Primary research studies examining blood or urine biomarkers in humans published in English up until August 2022 were included. Studies with more than 10 patients with clear methodology and surgical staging of endometriosis were included, whereas studies that included gynecological malignancies or who did not perform laparoscopy in the control group were excluded. The articles were assessed for the risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. One investigator extracted the data, and 2 investigators checked the accuracy. Extracted data were analyzed descriptively, the box plots of pooled data were calculated using RStudio, and the likelihood ratios were determined.

Results

A total of 8,244 and 3,619 manuscripts for blood and urine biomarkers were identified. After screening on the basis of the title, abstract, full text, and quality assurance, 18 of these studies assessing blood biomarkers and 15 examining urine biomarkers were eligible for data extraction. However, there were inconsistencies in the results indicating that standardized techniques would be essential for direct comparisons to be made in the future. In 4 of the eligible studies, the urine biomarkers were juxtaposed with blood markers; however, in most cases, the combination of blood and urine biomarkers resulted in an increase in the area under the curve value, sensitivity, and specificity. One study presented biomarkers with a likelihood ratio of >10. However, currently, none of the biomarkers have been shown to be clinically useful, and further research is necessary to determine their utility in clinical practice.

Conclusion

Multiple biomarkers described here provide exciting avenues for further study particularly as part of diagnostic panels, including the endometrial antigens tropomyosin 3, stomatin-like protein 2, and tropomodulin 3, microribonucleic acids, and interleukins. There is a need for standardized protocols to be used to achieve consistent, reproducible results that will facilitate the development of a clinically applicable noninvasive test for endometriosis.

血液和尿液生物标志物对子宫内膜异位症无创诊断的准确性和实用性:系统文献综述和荟萃分析
子宫内膜异位症是一种慢性、不可治愈的疾病,与衰弱性疼痛和低生育能力有关,影响着全球1.9亿多妇女,目前尚无可靠的非侵入性诊断工具。我们旨在确定无创液体活检生物标志物检测的最新技术,并预测子宫内膜异位症检测最有前景的生物标志物。证据综述使用PubMed、MEDLINE、Scopus和Cochrane Library数据库,按照系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南对文献进行了系统综述。包括截至2022年8月以英文发表的检测人类血液或尿液生物标志物的初步研究。纳入了对10多名子宫内膜异位症患者的研究,这些患者具有明确的方法和手术分期,而排除了包括妇科恶性肿瘤或对照组中未进行腹腔镜检查的患者的研究。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具评估文章的偏倚风险。一名研究人员提取了数据,两名研究人员检查了数据的准确性。对提取的数据进行描述性分析,使用RStudio计算合并数据的箱形图,并确定似然比。结果共鉴定出8244份和3619份血液和尿液生物标志物手稿。在根据标题、摘要、全文和质量保证进行筛选后,这些研究中有18项评估血液生物标志物,15项检查尿液生物标志物符合数据提取条件。然而,结果中存在不一致之处,这表明标准化技术对于未来进行直接比较至关重要。在4项符合条件的研究中,尿液生物标志物与血液标志物并列;然而,在大多数情况下,血液和尿液生物标志物的组合导致曲线下面积值、敏感性和特异性的增加。一项研究提出了具有>;10.然而,目前,没有一种生物标志物被证明在临床上有用,需要进一步的研究来确定它们在临床实践中的效用。结论本文描述的多种生物标志物为进一步研究提供了令人兴奋的途径,特别是作为诊断小组的一部分,包括子宫内膜抗原原肌球蛋白3、气孔蛋白样蛋白2和原调节蛋白3、微小核糖核酸和白细胞介素。需要使用标准化方案来实现一致、可重复的结果,这将有助于开发临床适用的子宫内膜异位症非侵入性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F&S reviews
F&S reviews Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Urology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信