Anthropophagy and the human flesh in psychoanalysis

Alessandra Affortunati Martins
{"title":"Anthropophagy and the human flesh in psychoanalysis","authors":"Alessandra Affortunati Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2023.100365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This is an epistemological theoretical analysis that aims to show how the cannibal trope and the flesh are repressed in psychoanalysis.</p></div><div><h3>Context</h3><p>For this, I rescue the discussion that subdivides matriarchy and patriarchy, made by Freud in <em>Moses and Monotheism</em>. There, the abstraction and the negative facet of thought is taken as superior as the body and the sensitive field. In order to show the limits of this vision that marks psychoanalysis almost as a whole, I present reflections made by Oswald de Andrade in his noted essay <em>The crisis of messianic philosophy</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The procedure was the analysis of both texts (<em>Moses and Monotheism</em> and <em>The crisis of messianic philosophy</em>) with the flesh outline as a critic of the patriarchy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Instead of a negative and moral character, as it has been observed in Western culture, Oswald postulates the anthropophagy that devours elements of European culture, without allowing cultural aspects to be colonized. The anthropophagic model marks the culture of the Amerindian peoples, which incorporates aggressiveness and love in a single central gesture in religious and collective rituals that happen among them: anthropophagy.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>The repression of the flesh and of the anthropophagic devouring return impetuously as violence in Western civilization, destroying in an unavoidable way all-civilized pretensions achieved by sublimation processes. The conclusion points to what we should learn from Amerindian models and autarchic cultures: an amalgamation of love and hate that drives to a less destructive cultural forms and to a better relation to nature and to humans.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542360623000355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This is an epistemological theoretical analysis that aims to show how the cannibal trope and the flesh are repressed in psychoanalysis.

Context

For this, I rescue the discussion that subdivides matriarchy and patriarchy, made by Freud in Moses and Monotheism. There, the abstraction and the negative facet of thought is taken as superior as the body and the sensitive field. In order to show the limits of this vision that marks psychoanalysis almost as a whole, I present reflections made by Oswald de Andrade in his noted essay The crisis of messianic philosophy.

Method

The procedure was the analysis of both texts (Moses and Monotheism and The crisis of messianic philosophy) with the flesh outline as a critic of the patriarchy.

Results

Instead of a negative and moral character, as it has been observed in Western culture, Oswald postulates the anthropophagy that devours elements of European culture, without allowing cultural aspects to be colonized. The anthropophagic model marks the culture of the Amerindian peoples, which incorporates aggressiveness and love in a single central gesture in religious and collective rituals that happen among them: anthropophagy.

Interpretation

The repression of the flesh and of the anthropophagic devouring return impetuously as violence in Western civilization, destroying in an unavoidable way all-civilized pretensions achieved by sublimation processes. The conclusion points to what we should learn from Amerindian models and autarchic cultures: an amalgamation of love and hate that drives to a less destructive cultural forms and to a better relation to nature and to humans.

精神分析中的人噬与人的肉体
这是一种认识论理论分析,旨在展示食人比喻和肉体在精神分析中是如何被压抑的。上下文为此,我挽救了弗洛伊德在《摩西与一神论》中对母系和父权制的细分讨论。在那里,思想的抽象和消极方面被视为与身体和敏感领域一样优越。为了展示这种几乎作为一个整体标志着精神分析的视野的局限性,我介绍了奥斯瓦尔德·德安德拉德在其著名文章《救世主哲学的危机》中的反思。方法对《摩西与一神论》和《弥赛亚哲学的危机》这两部文本进行分析,并以批判父权制的形象对其进行剖析。结果奥斯瓦尔德并没有像西方文化中所观察到的那样具有消极和道德的性格,而是假定了吞噬欧洲文化元素的噬人癖,而不允许文化方面被殖民化。食人模式标志着美洲印第安人的文化,在他们之间发生的宗教和集体仪式中,将侵略性和爱融入了一个单一的中心姿态:食人。在西方文明中,对肉体的镇压和对吞噬人类的行为作为暴力而迅速回归,以不可避免的方式摧毁了所有通过升华过程实现的文明伪装。结论指出了我们应该从美洲印第安人的模式和自给自足的文化中学习什么:爱与恨的融合,促使我们形成一种破坏性较小的文化形式,并与自然和人类建立更好的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信