SEEC and CHASE: An emotion-cause pair-oriented approach and conversational dataset with heterogeneous emotions for empathetic response generation

IF 7.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Srishti Gupta, Sourav Kumar Dandapat
{"title":"SEEC and CHASE: An emotion-cause pair-oriented approach and conversational dataset with heterogeneous emotions for empathetic response generation","authors":"Srishti Gupta,&nbsp;Sourav Kumar Dandapat","doi":"10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>E</strong>mpathetic <strong>R</strong>esponse <strong>G</strong>eneration (ERG) in dialog agents has gained tremendous attention in the recent past. Among various methods used to impart empathy in the generated response, the contemporary one is using the emotion cause. Previous works of ERG have 2 major flaws: (1) usage of the emotion detected using the entire conversation to generate the empathetic response is heavily misleading as the speaker might be going through a completely different emotion in his last utterance. This erroneous emotion detection, in turn, leads to incorrect detection of the cause of that emotion. (2) Usage of entire utterance has proven to be inefficient in the cause extraction task. Consequently, existing works fail to capture multiple emotion clauses and their corresponding emotion causes for efficient ERG. In our work, we introduce a new dataset,<span><sup>1</sup></span> <strong>CHASE</strong>, which is a compilation of conversations extracted from various plays to highlight the above-mentioned change in emotion and how one can show empathy in such a case. In this dataset, we use Dr. Brene Brown’s <span><sup>2</sup></span> notion of empathy on how to administer this change in emotion in the response and still sound empathetic by generating golden responses for each conversation. To address the aforementioned flaws, we also propose a model, <strong>SEEC</strong>, that utilizes the Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction task on the conversation to find various {emotion clause, cause clause} pairs and use these to impart empathy appropriately to the responses. Our qualitative and quantitative results prove the efficiency in generating enhanced empathetic responses of both SEEC and CHASE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49939,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge-Based Systems","volume":"280 ","pages":"Article 111039"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge-Based Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095070512300789X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empathetic Response Generation (ERG) in dialog agents has gained tremendous attention in the recent past. Among various methods used to impart empathy in the generated response, the contemporary one is using the emotion cause. Previous works of ERG have 2 major flaws: (1) usage of the emotion detected using the entire conversation to generate the empathetic response is heavily misleading as the speaker might be going through a completely different emotion in his last utterance. This erroneous emotion detection, in turn, leads to incorrect detection of the cause of that emotion. (2) Usage of entire utterance has proven to be inefficient in the cause extraction task. Consequently, existing works fail to capture multiple emotion clauses and their corresponding emotion causes for efficient ERG. In our work, we introduce a new dataset,1 CHASE, which is a compilation of conversations extracted from various plays to highlight the above-mentioned change in emotion and how one can show empathy in such a case. In this dataset, we use Dr. Brene Brown’s 2 notion of empathy on how to administer this change in emotion in the response and still sound empathetic by generating golden responses for each conversation. To address the aforementioned flaws, we also propose a model, SEEC, that utilizes the Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction task on the conversation to find various {emotion clause, cause clause} pairs and use these to impart empathy appropriately to the responses. Our qualitative and quantitative results prove the efficiency in generating enhanced empathetic responses of both SEEC and CHASE.

SEEC和CHASE:一种面向情绪-原因配对的方法和具有异质情绪的会话数据集,用于移情反应生成
近年来,对话主体中的交感反应生成(ERG)引起了人们的极大关注。在用于在产生的反应中传递同理心的各种方法中,当代的方法是使用情感原因。ERG先前的工作有两个主要缺陷:(1)使用在整个对话中检测到的情绪来产生移情反应是严重误导的,因为说话者可能在最后一次说话中经历了完全不同的情绪。这种错误的情绪检测反过来又导致对情绪原因的错误检测。(2) 在原因提取任务中,整个话语的使用已被证明是低效的。因此,现有的工作未能捕捉到有效ERG的多个情绪分句及其相应的情绪原因。在我们的工作中,我们引入了一个新的数据集1 CHASE,它是从各种戏剧中提取的对话的汇编,以突出上述情绪的变化,以及在这种情况下如何表现出同理心。在这个数据集中,我们使用了Brene Brown博士的2个移情概念,来研究如何在回应中管理这种情绪变化,并通过为每次对话生成黄金回应来听起来仍然具有同理心。为了解决上述缺陷,我们还提出了一个模型SEEC,该模型利用对话中的情绪-原因对提取任务来找到各种{情绪-子句,原因-子句}对,并利用这些对适当地向反应传递同理心。我们的定性和定量结果证明了SEEC和CHASE在产生增强的移情反应方面的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Knowledge-Based Systems
Knowledge-Based Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1245
审稿时长
7.8 months
期刊介绍: Knowledge-Based Systems, an international and interdisciplinary journal in artificial intelligence, publishes original, innovative, and creative research results in the field. It focuses on knowledge-based and other artificial intelligence techniques-based systems. The journal aims to support human prediction and decision-making through data science and computation techniques, provide a balanced coverage of theory and practical study, and encourage the development and implementation of knowledge-based intelligence models, methods, systems, and software tools. Applications in business, government, education, engineering, and healthcare are emphasized.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信