Co-creating socio-technical scenarios for net-zero emission pathways: Comparison of five national case studies

Jakob Wachsmuth , Philine Warnke , Ajay Gambhir , Sara Giarola , Konstantinos Koasidis , Shivika Mittal , Alexandros Nikas , Kathleen Vaillancourt , Haris Doukas
{"title":"Co-creating socio-technical scenarios for net-zero emission pathways: Comparison of five national case studies","authors":"Jakob Wachsmuth ,&nbsp;Philine Warnke ,&nbsp;Ajay Gambhir ,&nbsp;Sara Giarola ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Koasidis ,&nbsp;Shivika Mittal ,&nbsp;Alexandros Nikas ,&nbsp;Kathleen Vaillancourt ,&nbsp;Haris Doukas","doi":"10.1016/j.rset.2023.100064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The extent to which modelled future pathways support effective policymaking for sustainability transitions has been questioned for a long time, with one major issue being the insufficient integration with the perspectives of policymakers and other stakeholders. One proposal to address this issue has been to set up facilitative dialogues with stakeholders to extend model-based pathways to socio-technical scenarios. This paper presents the results of a first series of such co-creation workshops, where stakeholders discussed bottlenecks for model-based decarbonisation pathways and ways to overcome these bottlenecks through tailored policy mixes. The workshops took place in five countries: Brazil, Canada, Greece, Germany, and the UK, each with a specific sector focus. In all five workshops, it became clear that substantial tensions exist between the “ideal” modelled decarbonisation pathways and the real-world situation on the ground. Also, adverse political framework conditions, uncertainty of future policies and resistance of powerful actors were emphasised as overarching bottlenecks in most workshops. At the same time, in several instances stakeholders pointed out important aspects of transformative trajectories that are not covered by the models. Some challenges and solutions stand out in all countries in spite of the strong diversity of contexts: allocation of capital towards massive investments into low-carbon solutions; infrastructure development for generation and transport of hydrogen, capture and use of CO<sub>2</sub> as well as electricity grid and storage adapted to renewable energy solutions; stakeholder and citizen dialogues, where agreement is reached on cornerstones of long-term decarbonisation trajectories; and demand-side measures complementing investments into low-carbon processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101071,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667095X2300020X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The extent to which modelled future pathways support effective policymaking for sustainability transitions has been questioned for a long time, with one major issue being the insufficient integration with the perspectives of policymakers and other stakeholders. One proposal to address this issue has been to set up facilitative dialogues with stakeholders to extend model-based pathways to socio-technical scenarios. This paper presents the results of a first series of such co-creation workshops, where stakeholders discussed bottlenecks for model-based decarbonisation pathways and ways to overcome these bottlenecks through tailored policy mixes. The workshops took place in five countries: Brazil, Canada, Greece, Germany, and the UK, each with a specific sector focus. In all five workshops, it became clear that substantial tensions exist between the “ideal” modelled decarbonisation pathways and the real-world situation on the ground. Also, adverse political framework conditions, uncertainty of future policies and resistance of powerful actors were emphasised as overarching bottlenecks in most workshops. At the same time, in several instances stakeholders pointed out important aspects of transformative trajectories that are not covered by the models. Some challenges and solutions stand out in all countries in spite of the strong diversity of contexts: allocation of capital towards massive investments into low-carbon solutions; infrastructure development for generation and transport of hydrogen, capture and use of CO2 as well as electricity grid and storage adapted to renewable energy solutions; stakeholder and citizen dialogues, where agreement is reached on cornerstones of long-term decarbonisation trajectories; and demand-side measures complementing investments into low-carbon processes.

共同创造净零排放途径的社会技术情景:五个国家案例研究的比较
长期以来,建模的未来路径在多大程度上支持可持续性转型的有效决策一直受到质疑,其中一个主要问题是与决策者和其他利益攸关方的观点没有充分融合。解决这一问题的一项建议是与利益攸关方建立促进性对话,将基于模型的途径扩展到社会技术场景。本文介绍了第一系列此类共创研讨会的结果,利益相关者在研讨会上讨论了基于模型的脱碳途径的瓶颈,以及通过量身定制的政策组合克服这些瓶颈的方法。研讨会在五个国家举行:巴西、加拿大、希腊、德国和英国,每个国家都有特定的行业重点。在所有五个研讨会上,很明显,“理想”的脱碳途径与实际情况之间存在着巨大的紧张关系。此外,在大多数研讨会上,不利的政治框架条件、未来政策的不确定性和强大行为者的抵制被强调为首要瓶颈。与此同时,在一些情况下,利益攸关方指出了模型未涵盖的变革轨迹的重要方面。尽管情况千差万别,但一些挑战和解决方案在所有国家都很突出:将资本分配给低碳解决方案的大规模投资;氢的生产和运输、二氧化碳的捕获和使用以及适应可再生能源解决方案的电网和存储的基础设施开发;利益相关者和公民对话,就长期脱碳轨迹的基石达成协议;以及需求侧措施,以补充对低碳进程的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信