Stakeholder-driven scenario analysis of ambitious decarbonisation of the Russian economy

Alexander A. Shirov , Andrey Yu. Kolpakov , Ajay Gambhir , Konstantinos Koasidis , Alexandre C. Köberle , Ben McWilliams , Alexandros Nikas
{"title":"Stakeholder-driven scenario analysis of ambitious decarbonisation of the Russian economy","authors":"Alexander A. Shirov ,&nbsp;Andrey Yu. Kolpakov ,&nbsp;Ajay Gambhir ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Koasidis ,&nbsp;Alexandre C. Köberle ,&nbsp;Ben McWilliams ,&nbsp;Alexandros Nikas","doi":"10.1016/j.rset.2023.100055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Climate change mitigation entails different meanings for developed and developing countries. As a major emitting, high-income, developing economy that is largely dependant on hydrocarbons, Russia currently sits in the middle of the two groups, needing not only to drastically reduce emissions but also to ensure necessary economic growth to finance decarbonisation. This study explores two mitigation scenarios, one reflecting a cautious and the other a more ambitious decarbonisation pathway for Russia. These scenarios are co-created with a group of 135 national stakeholders, who inform the underlying assumptions based on their perceptions, expectations, and reservations: the more conservative scenario reflects the average of all input, while the ambitious scenario represents the optimistic end of the stakeholder input range. The two scenarios are modelled in CONTO, an input-output system of interconnected macro-structural calculations at the national level, to analyse the interplay between Russia's economy and decarbonisation progress, shedding light on the implications of mitigation for socioeconomic development. We find that, even for a country as dependant on hydrocarbons and under the most ambitious pathway that is still within experts’ realistic reach, Russia can achieve drastic reduction in absolute emissions and reach net-zero closely after 2050, while also achieving positive economic development in the long run. We highlight the need to prioritise a diverse set of mitigation options currently available and relevant to the Russian context, including energy efficiency and intensity improvements, electrification, and nuclear power, as well as to exploit the large potential lying within the Russian ecosystem's carbon sinks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101071,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667095X23000119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change mitigation entails different meanings for developed and developing countries. As a major emitting, high-income, developing economy that is largely dependant on hydrocarbons, Russia currently sits in the middle of the two groups, needing not only to drastically reduce emissions but also to ensure necessary economic growth to finance decarbonisation. This study explores two mitigation scenarios, one reflecting a cautious and the other a more ambitious decarbonisation pathway for Russia. These scenarios are co-created with a group of 135 national stakeholders, who inform the underlying assumptions based on their perceptions, expectations, and reservations: the more conservative scenario reflects the average of all input, while the ambitious scenario represents the optimistic end of the stakeholder input range. The two scenarios are modelled in CONTO, an input-output system of interconnected macro-structural calculations at the national level, to analyse the interplay between Russia's economy and decarbonisation progress, shedding light on the implications of mitigation for socioeconomic development. We find that, even for a country as dependant on hydrocarbons and under the most ambitious pathway that is still within experts’ realistic reach, Russia can achieve drastic reduction in absolute emissions and reach net-zero closely after 2050, while also achieving positive economic development in the long run. We highlight the need to prioritise a diverse set of mitigation options currently available and relevant to the Russian context, including energy efficiency and intensity improvements, electrification, and nuclear power, as well as to exploit the large potential lying within the Russian ecosystem's carbon sinks.

利益相关者驱动的俄罗斯经济雄心勃勃的脱碳情景分析
减缓气候变化对发达国家和发展中国家具有不同的意义。作为一个主要的排放高收入发展中经济体,主要依赖碳氢化合物,俄罗斯目前处于这两个群体的中间,不仅需要大幅减少排放,还需要确保必要的经济增长,为脱碳提供资金。这项研究探讨了两种缓解方案,一种反映了俄罗斯谨慎的脱碳途径,另一种则是更雄心勃勃的脱碳途径。这些情景是与135个国家利益相关者共同创建的,他们根据自己的看法、期望和保留意见告知基本假设:更保守的情景反映了所有投入的平均值,而雄心勃勃的情景代表了利益相关者投入范围的乐观端。这两种情景在CONTO中建模,CONTO是一个国家层面相互关联的宏观结构计算的投入产出系统,用于分析俄罗斯经济与脱碳进展之间的相互作用,揭示缓解措施对社会经济发展的影响。我们发现,即使对于一个依赖碳氢化合物的国家来说,在专家们现实可行的最雄心勃勃的道路上,俄罗斯也可以大幅减少绝对排放量,并在2050年后接近净零排放,同时从长远来看也能实现积极的经济发展。我们强调,有必要优先考虑目前可用的、与俄罗斯背景相关的一系列多样的缓解方案,包括能源效率和强度的提高、电气化和核能,并利用俄罗斯生态系统碳汇中的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信