Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Recent evolution and technical improvement

Kiminari Kataoka, Yuichi Hoshino, Koji Nukuto
{"title":"Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Recent evolution and technical improvement","authors":"Kiminari Kataoka,&nbsp;Yuichi Hoshino,&nbsp;Koji Nukuto","doi":"10.1016/j.jjoisr.2023.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most common knee injuries in young and active patients. ACL reconstruction has been usually recommended to restore anterior-posterior as well as rotatory knee stability. However, there are still some issues to be addressed in ACL reconstruction. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to summarize the current literature regarding recent evolution and technical improvement of ACL reconstruction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding graft selection in ACL reconstruction, surgical technique (especially double-bundle ACL reconstruction), and additional procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There is still no gold standard for graft selection, while it should be individualized for each patient. Hamstrings tendon autograft and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft are often chosen, although quadriceps tendon autograft has increased in popularity. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction was introduced to restore normal knee kinematics by closely mimicking the native anatomy. Although clinical advantages of double-bundle ACL reconstruction such as improved clinical outcome and better anteroposterior and rotatory stability have been reported, current global trend of ACL reconstruction technique is unfavourable due to technical difficulty and surgical complications. Further evolution and technical improvement are required to achieve “true” double-bundle ACL reconstruction. An additional procedure such as lateral extra-articular tenodesis, anterolateral ligament reconstruction, and anterior closing wedge osteotomy, may be considered for ACL reconstruction, especially for revision ACL reconstruction, to prevent a graft re-rupture.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ACL reconstruction has evolved over time in terms of technique, graft selection, and additional procedures. However, there is still room for improvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 97-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705123000087/pdfft?md5=da00f71c45228dc21792fb38a32d2ca0&pid=1-s2.0-S2949705123000087-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705123000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most common knee injuries in young and active patients. ACL reconstruction has been usually recommended to restore anterior-posterior as well as rotatory knee stability. However, there are still some issues to be addressed in ACL reconstruction. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to summarize the current literature regarding recent evolution and technical improvement of ACL reconstruction.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding graft selection in ACL reconstruction, surgical technique (especially double-bundle ACL reconstruction), and additional procedures.

Results

There is still no gold standard for graft selection, while it should be individualized for each patient. Hamstrings tendon autograft and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft are often chosen, although quadriceps tendon autograft has increased in popularity. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction was introduced to restore normal knee kinematics by closely mimicking the native anatomy. Although clinical advantages of double-bundle ACL reconstruction such as improved clinical outcome and better anteroposterior and rotatory stability have been reported, current global trend of ACL reconstruction technique is unfavourable due to technical difficulty and surgical complications. Further evolution and technical improvement are required to achieve “true” double-bundle ACL reconstruction. An additional procedure such as lateral extra-articular tenodesis, anterolateral ligament reconstruction, and anterior closing wedge osteotomy, may be considered for ACL reconstruction, especially for revision ACL reconstruction, to prevent a graft re-rupture.

Conclusion

ACL reconstruction has evolved over time in terms of technique, graft selection, and additional procedures. However, there is still room for improvement.

前交叉韧带重建:最新进展和技术改进
目的前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤是年轻活动期最常见的膝关节损伤之一。ACL重建通常被推荐用于恢复膝关节前后和旋转稳定性。然而,在ACL重建中仍有一些问题需要解决。因此,本综述的目的是总结当前关于ACL重建的最新进展和技术改进的文献。方法我们对ACL重建中移植物的选择、手术技术(尤其是双束ACL重建)和附加手术的文献进行了全面的回顾。结果目前还没有选择移植物的金标准,但应该针对每个患者进行个性化选择。自体腘绳肌腱和自体骨-髌腱-骨通常被选择,尽管自体股四头肌肌腱移植越来越受欢迎。双束前交叉韧带重建被引入,通过密切模拟本地解剖结构来恢复正常的膝关节运动学。尽管双束ACL重建的临床优势已被报道,如改善临床结果、更好的前后和旋转稳定性,但由于技术难度和手术并发症,当前ACL重建技术的全球趋势是不利的。需要进一步的进化和技术改进才能实现“真正”的双束ACL重建。ACL重建,尤其是翻修ACL重建,可以考虑采用额外的手术,如外侧关节外肌腱固定、前外侧韧带重建和前闭合楔形截骨,以防止移植物复发。结论ACL重建在技术、移植物选择和额外手术方面随着时间的推移而发展。然而,仍有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信