Lateral meniscal status, chronicity of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency, and initial graft tension were associated with abnormal knee laxity after anatomical ACL reconstruction

Shuji Taketomi, Ryota Yamagami, Kohei Kawaguchi, Kenichi Kono, Ryo Murakami, Tomofumi Kage, Takahiro Arakawa, Hiroshi Inui, Sakae Tanaka
{"title":"Lateral meniscal status, chronicity of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency, and initial graft tension were associated with abnormal knee laxity after anatomical ACL reconstruction","authors":"Shuji Taketomi,&nbsp;Ryota Yamagami,&nbsp;Kohei Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Kenichi Kono,&nbsp;Ryo Murakami,&nbsp;Tomofumi Kage,&nbsp;Takahiro Arakawa,&nbsp;Hiroshi Inui,&nbsp;Sakae Tanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.jjoisr.2022.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Graft failure or recurrence of instability without obvious trauma remains one of the problems following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for abnormal knee laxity after anatomical ACL reconstruction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 291 patients who underwent primary anatomical ACL reconstruction were included in this study. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), time to surgery, medial meniscal status, lateral meniscal status, graft materials, initial graft tension protocol, preoperative and postoperative pivot shift test and side-to-side differences in anterior tibial translation using the arthrometer were reviewed. Abnormal knee laxity was defined as constituting one or both of the following criteria: (i) a side-to-side difference of ≥3 mm by arthrometer; and (ii) a positive pivot shift test, being “glide,” “clunk”, or “gross”.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Abnormal knee laxity occurred in 30 patients (10.3%) at a median follow-up of 25 months. Results of univariate analysis indicated that a higher likelihood of abnormal knee laxity was associated with female sex, greater BMI, longer time to surgery, higher initial graft tension protocol, and lateral meniscus resection. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that abnormal knee laxity was significantly associated with time to surgery [1-month increase; odds ratio (OR), 1.01], higher initial graft tension protocol (<em>vs.</em> lower tension; OR, 3.5), and lateral meniscus resection (<em>vs.</em> intact and repaired lateral meniscus; OR, 12.8).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Higher initial graft tension protocol, chronicity of ACL deficiency, and lateral meniscus resection were risk factors for abnormal knee laxity after anatomical ACL reconstruction.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level III retrospective prognostic study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705122000056/pdfft?md5=96802dcf050a28c65d71cc1a764acf2f&pid=1-s2.0-S2949705122000056-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705122000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Graft failure or recurrence of instability without obvious trauma remains one of the problems following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for abnormal knee laxity after anatomical ACL reconstruction.

Methods

A total of 291 patients who underwent primary anatomical ACL reconstruction were included in this study. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), time to surgery, medial meniscal status, lateral meniscal status, graft materials, initial graft tension protocol, preoperative and postoperative pivot shift test and side-to-side differences in anterior tibial translation using the arthrometer were reviewed. Abnormal knee laxity was defined as constituting one or both of the following criteria: (i) a side-to-side difference of ≥3 mm by arthrometer; and (ii) a positive pivot shift test, being “glide,” “clunk”, or “gross”.

Results

Abnormal knee laxity occurred in 30 patients (10.3%) at a median follow-up of 25 months. Results of univariate analysis indicated that a higher likelihood of abnormal knee laxity was associated with female sex, greater BMI, longer time to surgery, higher initial graft tension protocol, and lateral meniscus resection. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that abnormal knee laxity was significantly associated with time to surgery [1-month increase; odds ratio (OR), 1.01], higher initial graft tension protocol (vs. lower tension; OR, 3.5), and lateral meniscus resection (vs. intact and repaired lateral meniscus; OR, 12.8).

Conclusion

Higher initial graft tension protocol, chronicity of ACL deficiency, and lateral meniscus resection were risk factors for abnormal knee laxity after anatomical ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence

Level III retrospective prognostic study.

半月板外侧状态、前交叉韧带(ACL)缺乏的长期性和初始移植物张力与解剖结构重建后的异常膝关节松弛有关
目的移植失败或不稳定复发而无明显创伤仍然是前交叉韧带重建后的问题之一。这项回顾性研究旨在确定解剖前交叉韧带重建后膝关节异常松弛的危险因素。方法本研究共纳入291例原发性ACL解剖重建患者。综述了性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、手术时间、内侧半月板状态、外侧半月板状态、移植物材料、初始移植物张力方案、术前和术后枢轴移位测试以及使用关节测量仪进行胫骨前移的侧边差异。异常膝关节松弛被定义为构成以下一个或两个标准:(i)关节测量仪测得的侧差≥3mm;结果30例(10.3%)患者在中位随访25个月时出现异常膝关节松弛。单因素分析结果表明,膝关节异常松弛的可能性较高与女性、较大的BMI、较长的手术时间、较高的初始移植物张力方案和外侧半月板切除有关。多因素logistic回归分析显示,异常膝关节松弛与手术时间显著相关[1个月增加;比值比(OR),1.01],较高的初始移植物张力方案(与较低的张力相比;OR,3.5)和侧半月板切除术(与完整和修复的侧半月板相比;OR为12.8),半月板外侧切除是ACL解剖重建后膝关节异常松弛的危险因素。证据水平III级回顾性预后研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信