Role of course relevance and course content quality in MOOCs acceptance and use

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Chimobi R. Ucha
{"title":"Role of course relevance and course content quality in MOOCs acceptance and use","authors":"Chimobi R. Ucha","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite several benefits attributed to the use of MOOCs for learning, acceptance levels remain low and studies investigating adoption and use of the technology are limited. This study draws from the literature on specific factors that influence online learning environments and extends the technology acceptance model (TAM) to understand if those factors can be used to explain and facilitate MOOCs acceptance and use behaviors among learners. The factors investigated include, course content quality, course relevance, course instructor quality, course design quality, learner-instructor interaction, and learner-interaction. There were 138 participants in the study. Partial Least Squares SEM (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze the relationships proposed for the study. The results suggest that the extended TAM offered a good explanation of MOOC acceptance and use, with course relevance and course content quality as external variables affecting MOOCs acceptance. Findings from this study provides practical implications for MOOCs implementation to increase acceptance and further lays a foundation for future research</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100147"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557323000253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite several benefits attributed to the use of MOOCs for learning, acceptance levels remain low and studies investigating adoption and use of the technology are limited. This study draws from the literature on specific factors that influence online learning environments and extends the technology acceptance model (TAM) to understand if those factors can be used to explain and facilitate MOOCs acceptance and use behaviors among learners. The factors investigated include, course content quality, course relevance, course instructor quality, course design quality, learner-instructor interaction, and learner-interaction. There were 138 participants in the study. Partial Least Squares SEM (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze the relationships proposed for the study. The results suggest that the extended TAM offered a good explanation of MOOC acceptance and use, with course relevance and course content quality as external variables affecting MOOCs acceptance. Findings from this study provides practical implications for MOOCs implementation to increase acceptance and further lays a foundation for future research

课程相关性和课程内容质量在MOOC接受和使用中的作用
尽管MOOC的使用带来了一些好处,但接受程度仍然很低,调查该技术的采用和使用情况的研究也很有限。本研究借鉴了影响在线学习环境的特定因素的文献,并扩展了技术接受模型(TAM),以了解这些因素是否可以用来解释和促进学习者对MOOC的接受和使用行为。调查的因素包括课程内容质量、课程相关性、课程讲师质量、课程设计质量、学习者与讲师的互动以及学习者与教师的互动。这项研究共有138名参与者。偏最小二乘扫描电镜(PLS-SEM)用于分析为研究提出的关系。结果表明,扩展的TAM很好地解释了MOOC的接受和使用,课程相关性和课程内容质量是影响MOOC接受的外部变量。这项研究的结果为MOOC的实施提供了实际意义,以提高接受度,并为未来的研究奠定了基础
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信