Disciplinary differences and emotional presence in communities of inquiry: Teachers’ expressions of digital technology-enabled teaching

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Marcus Sundgren , Jimmy Jaldemark , Martha Cleveland-Innes
{"title":"Disciplinary differences and emotional presence in communities of inquiry: Teachers’ expressions of digital technology-enabled teaching","authors":"Marcus Sundgren ,&nbsp;Jimmy Jaldemark ,&nbsp;Martha Cleveland-Innes","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This work was built on two strands of earlier research on the community of inquiry framework (CoI). The first strand was Biglan's seminal work on disciplinary epistemological structures and how these structures impact digital technology-enabled higher education teaching. In the other strand, some rare studies suggested that emotional issues are important to understanding higher education teaching. Nevertheless, research that links these two strands is even rarer. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the relationship between digital technology-enabled teaching in higher educational settings, the presences of the community of inquiry framework (CoI), and disciplinary epistemological structures. Survey responses from 143 teachers were analyzed through confirmatory factor analysis (SEM) and reflexive thematic analysis. Emotional presence was found to be a possible fourth element in the CoI. Disciplinary differences (coded as pure vs. applied sciences) were found to have an effect on the CoI, and that effect was particularly evident through the mediation of emotional presence. The differentiating factor was teachers’ views on the role of teaching. When guiding digital design, the recommendation is to consider such disciplinary differences specifically.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100134"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557323000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work was built on two strands of earlier research on the community of inquiry framework (CoI). The first strand was Biglan's seminal work on disciplinary epistemological structures and how these structures impact digital technology-enabled higher education teaching. In the other strand, some rare studies suggested that emotional issues are important to understanding higher education teaching. Nevertheless, research that links these two strands is even rarer. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the relationship between digital technology-enabled teaching in higher educational settings, the presences of the community of inquiry framework (CoI), and disciplinary epistemological structures. Survey responses from 143 teachers were analyzed through confirmatory factor analysis (SEM) and reflexive thematic analysis. Emotional presence was found to be a possible fourth element in the CoI. Disciplinary differences (coded as pure vs. applied sciences) were found to have an effect on the CoI, and that effect was particularly evident through the mediation of emotional presence. The differentiating factor was teachers’ views on the role of teaching. When guiding digital design, the recommendation is to consider such disciplinary differences specifically.

学科差异和探究社区中的情感存在:教师对数字技术教学的表达
这项工作建立在早期对调查社区框架(CoI)的两条研究基础上。第一部分是比格兰在学科认识论结构以及这些结构如何影响数字技术支持的高等教育教学方面的开创性工作。另一方面,一些罕见的研究表明,情感问题对理解高等教育教学很重要。尽管如此,将这两条线索联系起来的研究甚至更为罕见。因此,本研究旨在分析高等教育环境中数字技术教学、探究社区框架(CoI)的存在和学科认识论结构之间的关系。通过验证性因素分析(SEM)和反射性主题分析对143名教师的调查结果进行了分析。情绪存在被发现是CoI中可能的第四个元素。学科差异(编码为纯粹科学与应用科学)被发现对CoI有影响,这种影响通过情绪存在的中介作用尤为明显。区别因素是教师对教学作用的看法。在指导数字化设计时,建议具体考虑这些学科差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信