A sustainable Catch-22: An assessment of sustainability in the Dutch pension sector

Tom Ijzereef , Pieter van Beukering , Wouter Botzen
{"title":"A sustainable Catch-22: An assessment of sustainability in the Dutch pension sector","authors":"Tom Ijzereef ,&nbsp;Pieter van Beukering ,&nbsp;Wouter Botzen","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The relation between financial performance and sustainability in the global pension sector has been widely researched. Current research confirms that sustainable investments can have a positive influence on financial performance, but how that effect materializes is still debated. This study argues that the ambiguity concerning this positive impact is caused by a lack of integration of sustainability in organizations. This lack of integration causes the sustainability efforts to harm financial performance of the pension funds. Nevertheless, research shows that, if sustainability is integrated in the core logic of the organization, sustainability efforts do not yield lower returns. We assess the current level of sustainability integration in the Dutch pension fund sector using a multiple case study approach. Next, this study formulates the challenges related to sustainability integration in the sector, after which solutions to the specific problems are presented. Given the lack of integration, the barriers for increasing sustainability integration can be viewed as a Catch-22. First, a perceived separation is observed between the societal pressure to invest sustainably and constituents’ pressure to realize financial value. Second, pension funds are ill equipped for the complexity in sustainable investing and use a third party as investment manager, creating a dispersion of knowledge of sustainable investments and the responsibility to do so. To be able to solve the Catch-22 dilemma, greater collaboration, standardization and a sustainability vision are needed, resulting in a positive impact on sustainability and positive effects on financial return.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relation between financial performance and sustainability in the global pension sector has been widely researched. Current research confirms that sustainable investments can have a positive influence on financial performance, but how that effect materializes is still debated. This study argues that the ambiguity concerning this positive impact is caused by a lack of integration of sustainability in organizations. This lack of integration causes the sustainability efforts to harm financial performance of the pension funds. Nevertheless, research shows that, if sustainability is integrated in the core logic of the organization, sustainability efforts do not yield lower returns. We assess the current level of sustainability integration in the Dutch pension fund sector using a multiple case study approach. Next, this study formulates the challenges related to sustainability integration in the sector, after which solutions to the specific problems are presented. Given the lack of integration, the barriers for increasing sustainability integration can be viewed as a Catch-22. First, a perceived separation is observed between the societal pressure to invest sustainably and constituents’ pressure to realize financial value. Second, pension funds are ill equipped for the complexity in sustainable investing and use a third party as investment manager, creating a dispersion of knowledge of sustainable investments and the responsibility to do so. To be able to solve the Catch-22 dilemma, greater collaboration, standardization and a sustainability vision are needed, resulting in a positive impact on sustainability and positive effects on financial return.

可持续的第二十二条军规:荷兰养老金行业可持续性评估
全球养老金部门的财务业绩与可持续性之间的关系已得到广泛研究。目前的研究证实,可持续投资可以对财务业绩产生积极影响,但这种影响如何实现仍存在争议。这项研究认为,这种积极影响的模糊性是由组织中缺乏可持续性的整合造成的。这种缺乏整合的情况导致可持续性努力损害了养老基金的财务业绩。然而,研究表明,如果可持续性被纳入组织的核心逻辑,可持续性努力不会产生较低的回报。我们使用多个案例研究方法评估了荷兰养老基金部门当前的可持续性整合水平。接下来,本研究阐述了与该行业可持续性整合相关的挑战,然后提出了具体问题的解决方案。鉴于缺乏一体化,增加可持续性一体化的障碍可以被视为第二十二条军规。首先,观察到可持续投资的社会压力和选民实现金融价值的压力之间存在明显的分离。其次,养老基金不具备可持续投资的复杂性,并使用第三方作为投资经理,造成了可持续投资知识和责任的分散。为了解决第二十二条军规的困境,需要加强合作、标准化和可持续发展愿景,从而对可持续性产生积极影响,并对财务回报产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信