Facilitators of effective interprofessional collaborative practice for physiotherapy private practitioners: An interpretive descriptive study

Q3 Social Sciences
Jack Seaton , Anne Jones , Catherine Johnston , Karen Francis
{"title":"Facilitators of effective interprofessional collaborative practice for physiotherapy private practitioners: An interpretive descriptive study","authors":"Jack Seaton ,&nbsp;Anne Jones ,&nbsp;Catherine Johnston ,&nbsp;Karen Francis","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite the growing presence of physiotherapy private practitioners within Australia's health care workforce, little is known about their perspectives of interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP). The aim of this study was to explore the facilitators of IPCP from the perspective of Australian physiotherapy private practitioners.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 physiotherapists and 64 h of observation was completed in 10 private practice sites in Queensland, Australia. Interview and observation data were pooled and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data analysis produced four main themes and three sub-themes that characterised physiotherapists’ perspectives on the facilitators of IPCP: (a) close physical proximity (integrated team membership; co-location; interior architecture); (b) technological advancements; (c) complex client presentations; and (d) positive professional reputation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study provides valuable insights into the facilitators of IPCP from the perspective of physiotherapy private practitioners. Emphasising close physical proximity of multiple health practitioners, leveraging technological innovations, recognising the value of IPCP for clients with chronic and complex care needs, and cultivating positive professional reputations can promote effective IPCP for physiotherapy private practitioners. The findings from this research may be used to guide the development of innovative strategies that will support robust and sustainable models of IPCP in the physiotherapy private practice setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the growing presence of physiotherapy private practitioners within Australia's health care workforce, little is known about their perspectives of interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP). The aim of this study was to explore the facilitators of IPCP from the perspective of Australian physiotherapy private practitioners.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 physiotherapists and 64 h of observation was completed in 10 private practice sites in Queensland, Australia. Interview and observation data were pooled and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

Data analysis produced four main themes and three sub-themes that characterised physiotherapists’ perspectives on the facilitators of IPCP: (a) close physical proximity (integrated team membership; co-location; interior architecture); (b) technological advancements; (c) complex client presentations; and (d) positive professional reputation.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the facilitators of IPCP from the perspective of physiotherapy private practitioners. Emphasising close physical proximity of multiple health practitioners, leveraging technological innovations, recognising the value of IPCP for clients with chronic and complex care needs, and cultivating positive professional reputations can promote effective IPCP for physiotherapy private practitioners. The findings from this research may be used to guide the development of innovative strategies that will support robust and sustainable models of IPCP in the physiotherapy private practice setting.

物理治疗私人执业医师有效跨专业合作实践的促进者:一项解释性描述性研究
引言尽管理疗私人从业者在澳大利亚的医疗保健队伍中越来越多,但他们对跨专业合作实践(IPCP)的看法却知之甚少。本研究的目的是从澳大利亚理疗私人从业者的角度探讨IPCP的促进者。方法对28名物理治疗师进行半结构化访谈,并在澳大利亚昆士兰的10个私人诊所进行了64小时的观察。访谈和观察数据被汇集起来,并使用反射性主题分析进行分析。结果数据分析产生了四个主要主题和三个子主题,这些主题是理疗师对IPCP促进者的看法的特点:(a)身体距离近(综合团队成员;同一地点;室内建筑);(b) 技术进步;(c) 复杂的客户演示;以及(d)积极的职业声誉。结论本研究从物理治疗私人执业医师的角度为IPCP的促进者提供了有价值的见解。强调多个健康从业者在身体上的紧密联系,利用技术创新,认识到IPCP对有慢性和复杂护理需求的客户的价值,并培养积极的职业声誉,可以促进物理治疗私人从业者的有效IPCP。这项研究的结果可用于指导创新战略的制定,这些战略将支持在理疗私人诊所环境中建立健全和可持续的IPCP模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信