Characterizing prospective secondary teachers’ foundation and contingency knowledge for definitions of transformations

Abstract

One promising approach for connecting undergraduate content coursework to secondary teaching is using teacher-created representations of practice. Using these representations effectively requires seeing teachers' use of mathematical knowledge in the work of teaching. We argue that the dimensions of Rowland's (2013) Knowledge Quartet, especially Foundation and Contingency, form a fruitful framework for this purpose. We contribute an analytic framework to characterize the quality of mathematical knowledge observed in the Foundation and Contingency dimensions, developed using a purposive sampling from over 300 representations. These representations all featured geometry teaching. We showcase the framework with examples of "high" and "developing" Foundation and Contingency.Then, we compare our coding along these dimensions with performance on a measure of mathematical knowledge for teaching geometry. Finally, we describe the potential for generalizing this framework to other domains, such as algebra and mathematical modeling.