Editorial (42.2)

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Tom Cornford
{"title":"Editorial (42.2)","authors":"Tom Cornford","doi":"10.1080/14682761.2022.2097368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p>This editorial explores synergies between the articles gathered in this issue, which take a range of approaches to developing ecological analyses of both the creation and reception of performances and theatre history more widely. The editorial concludes with a reflection on the current UK government’s deliberate dereliction of the higher education sector, and its consequnces for the arts and humanities in particular. It calls for a concerted effort to grasp the politics of this developing situation, arguing that this will require two things. First, we must understand the drastic reshaping of the sector and the reduction of arts and humanities provision as a deliberate objective of government. Secondly, we must seek to engage resistance to this project at the ecological level at which those of us who work in the sector are entangled in its delivery, and find ways of creating alternative possibilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":42067,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Theatre and Performance","volume":"44 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Theatre and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2022.2097368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This editorial explores synergies between the articles gathered in this issue, which take a range of approaches to developing ecological analyses of both the creation and reception of performances and theatre history more widely. The editorial concludes with a reflection on the current UK government’s deliberate dereliction of the higher education sector, and its consequnces for the arts and humanities in particular. It calls for a concerted effort to grasp the politics of this developing situation, arguing that this will require two things. First, we must understand the drastic reshaping of the sector and the reduction of arts and humanities provision as a deliberate objective of government. Secondly, we must seek to engage resistance to this project at the ecological level at which those of us who work in the sector are entangled in its delivery, and find ways of creating alternative possibilities.

编辑(42.2)
摘要这篇社论探讨了本期文章之间的协同作用,这些文章采用了一系列的方法来更广泛地发展对表演创作和接受以及戏剧史的生态分析。这篇社论最后反思了当前英国政府对高等教育部门的故意忽视,尤其是对艺术和人文学科的影响。它呼吁各方齐心协力,把握这一发展形势的政治,认为这需要两件事。首先,我们必须明白,政府有意为之的一个目标是,对教育部门进行剧烈的重塑,减少艺术和人文学科的提供。其次,我们必须在生态层面上寻求对这个项目的抵制,因为我们这些在这个领域工作的人被它的交付纠缠在一起,并找到创造替代可能性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信