Risk of Pancreatitis With Incretin Therapies Versus Thiazolidinediones in the Veterans Health Administration.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1177/10600280231205490
Kristen Wilhite, Jennifer Meyer Reid, Matthew Lane
{"title":"Risk of Pancreatitis With Incretin Therapies Versus Thiazolidinediones in the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Kristen Wilhite, Jennifer Meyer Reid, Matthew Lane","doi":"10.1177/10600280231205490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incretin therapies, comprised of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), have been increasingly utilized for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Previous studies have conflicting results regarding risk of pancreatitis associated with these agents-some suggest an increased risk and others find no correlation. Adverse event reporting systems indicate that incretin therapies are some of the most common drugs associated with reports of pancreatitis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the odds of developing pancreatitis in veterans with T2DM prescribed an incretin therapy versus thiazolidinediones (TZDs: pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing veterans with T2DM first prescribed an incretin therapy or a TZD between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021. A diagnosis of pancreatitis within 365 days of being prescribed either therapy was counted as a positive case. Data was collected and analyzed utilizing VA's Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI) and an adjusted odds ratio was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TZD cohort consisted of 42 912 patients compared with the incretin cohort of 304 811 patients. The TZD cohort had a pancreatitis incidence rate of 1.94 cases per 1000 patients. The incretin cohort had a incidence rate of 2.06 cases per 1000 patients. An adjusted odds ratio found no statistical difference of pancreatitis cases between the TZD and incretin cohorts (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.94, 95% CI [0.75, 1.18]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>This retrospective cohort study of national VHA data found a relatively low incidence of pancreatitis in both cohorts, and an adjusted odds ratio found no statistical difference of pancreatitis in patients prescribed an incretin therapy compared with a control group. This data adds to growing evidence that incretin therapies do not seem to be associated with an increased risk of developing pancreatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280231205490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Incretin therapies, comprised of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), have been increasingly utilized for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Previous studies have conflicting results regarding risk of pancreatitis associated with these agents-some suggest an increased risk and others find no correlation. Adverse event reporting systems indicate that incretin therapies are some of the most common drugs associated with reports of pancreatitis.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the odds of developing pancreatitis in veterans with T2DM prescribed an incretin therapy versus thiazolidinediones (TZDs: pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing veterans with T2DM first prescribed an incretin therapy or a TZD between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021. A diagnosis of pancreatitis within 365 days of being prescribed either therapy was counted as a positive case. Data was collected and analyzed utilizing VA's Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI) and an adjusted odds ratio was calculated.

Results: The TZD cohort consisted of 42 912 patients compared with the incretin cohort of 304 811 patients. The TZD cohort had a pancreatitis incidence rate of 1.94 cases per 1000 patients. The incretin cohort had a incidence rate of 2.06 cases per 1000 patients. An adjusted odds ratio found no statistical difference of pancreatitis cases between the TZD and incretin cohorts (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.94, 95% CI [0.75, 1.18]).

Conclusion and relevance: This retrospective cohort study of national VHA data found a relatively low incidence of pancreatitis in both cohorts, and an adjusted odds ratio found no statistical difference of pancreatitis in patients prescribed an incretin therapy compared with a control group. This data adds to growing evidence that incretin therapies do not seem to be associated with an increased risk of developing pancreatitis.

在退伍军人健康管理局中,使用促胰岛素治疗与噻唑烷二酮治疗胰腺炎的风险。
背景:由二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1-RA)组成的促生长素疗法已越来越多地用于治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)。先前的研究在与这些药物相关的胰腺炎风险方面有相互矛盾的结果,一些研究表明风险增加,另一些研究则没有发现相关性。不良事件报告系统表明肠促胰岛素治疗是与胰腺炎报告相关的一些最常见的药物。目的:本研究旨在比较退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)内给予肠促胰岛素治疗与噻唑烷二酮(TZD:吡格列酮和罗格列酮)的T2DM退伍军人患胰腺炎的几率。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,分析了2011年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间首次服用肠促胰岛素治疗或TZD的T2DM退伍军人。在接受任何一种治疗后365天内诊断为胰腺炎被视为阳性病例。利用弗吉尼亚州的信息和计算基础设施(VINCI)收集和分析数据,并计算调整后的比值比。结果:TZD队列由42人组成 912名患者与304名肠促生长素队列患者的比较 811名患者。TZD队列的胰腺炎发病率为1.94/1000名患者。肠促生长素队列的发病率为每1000名患者2.06例。经调整的比值比发现TZD和肠促胰岛素组之间的胰腺炎病例没有统计学差异(经调整的优势比[AOR]=0.94,95%CI[0.75,1.18])。结论和相关性:这项对国家VHA数据的回顾性队列研究发现,两个队列中的胰腺炎发病率相对较低,调整后的比值比发现,与对照组相比,接受肠促胰岛素治疗的患者的胰腺炎没有统计学差异。这一数据增加了越来越多的证据,证明肠促生长素治疗似乎与胰腺炎风险增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信