Developing a Simple Strategy for Roadside Spring Water Disinfection in Central Appalachia

IF 0.9 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
Hannah Patton, Leigh-Anne Krometis, Ben B. Faulkner, Alasdair Cohen, Erin Ling, Emily Sarver
{"title":"Developing a Simple Strategy for Roadside Spring Water Disinfection in Central Appalachia","authors":"Hannah Patton,&nbsp;Leigh-Anne Krometis,&nbsp;Ben B. Faulkner,&nbsp;Alasdair Cohen,&nbsp;Erin Ling,&nbsp;Emily Sarver","doi":"10.1111/j.1936-704X.2023.3388.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Several studies have highlighted issues of unreliable access to safe drinking water in the Appalachian region. In some cases, residents turn to roadside springs as a practical, and culturally valuable, drinking water source. However, public reliance on roadside springs for potable use can present concerns, as bacterial contamination of spring water has been documented throughout Appalachia. This study aimed to 1) develop a simple, low-cost protocol using household bleach to inactivate total coliform and <i>E. coli</i> in untreated roadside spring water; 2) provide educational materials at local roadside springs to inform users of this simple treatment strategy; and 3) assess spring user perceptions of the educational materials via a short survey. Laboratory scale trials emulating typical spring water collection and storage conditions investigated the use of household bleach (7.4-7.5% sodium hypochlorite) for total coliform and <i>E. coli</i> bacteria inactivation and free chlorine residual maintenance in spring water over time. Results showed that 2 drops (approximately 0.10 mL) of household bleach from an eyedropper per 1 gallon of spring water provided adequate total coliform and <i>E. coli</i> disinfection, while maintaining free chlorine levels below typical taste thresholds and providing sufficient residual over a 1-month trial period. An infographic communicating the disinfection protocol and a corresponding survey were created and distributed at roadside springs in rural regions of southwestern Virginia and southern West Virginia. The majority of spring user survey respondents (80%) reported that the infographic was generally helpful, and over half of respondents stated that they would use the bleach protocol.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2023.3388.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2023.3388.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies have highlighted issues of unreliable access to safe drinking water in the Appalachian region. In some cases, residents turn to roadside springs as a practical, and culturally valuable, drinking water source. However, public reliance on roadside springs for potable use can present concerns, as bacterial contamination of spring water has been documented throughout Appalachia. This study aimed to 1) develop a simple, low-cost protocol using household bleach to inactivate total coliform and E. coli in untreated roadside spring water; 2) provide educational materials at local roadside springs to inform users of this simple treatment strategy; and 3) assess spring user perceptions of the educational materials via a short survey. Laboratory scale trials emulating typical spring water collection and storage conditions investigated the use of household bleach (7.4-7.5% sodium hypochlorite) for total coliform and E. coli bacteria inactivation and free chlorine residual maintenance in spring water over time. Results showed that 2 drops (approximately 0.10 mL) of household bleach from an eyedropper per 1 gallon of spring water provided adequate total coliform and E. coli disinfection, while maintaining free chlorine levels below typical taste thresholds and providing sufficient residual over a 1-month trial period. An infographic communicating the disinfection protocol and a corresponding survey were created and distributed at roadside springs in rural regions of southwestern Virginia and southern West Virginia. The majority of spring user survey respondents (80%) reported that the infographic was generally helpful, and over half of respondents stated that they would use the bleach protocol.

Abstract Image

阿巴拉契亚中部路边泉水消毒的简单策略
几项研究强调了阿巴拉契亚地区获得安全饮用水的不可靠问题。在某些情况下,居民会将路边的泉水作为一种实用且具有文化价值的饮用水源。然而,公众对路边泉水的饮用依赖可能会引起关注,因为阿巴拉契亚地区的泉水受到细菌污染。这项研究旨在1)开发一种简单、低成本的方案,使用家用漂白剂灭活未经处理的路边泉水中的总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌;2) 在当地路边的泉水处提供教育材料,向使用者介绍这种简单的治疗策略;以及3)通过短期调查评估春季用户对教育材料的看法。模拟典型泉水收集和储存条件的实验室规模试验调查了家用漂白剂(7.4-7.5%次氯酸钠)在一段时间内对泉水中总大肠杆菌和大肠杆菌的灭活和游离氯残留量的保持。结果显示,每1加仑泉水从滴管中滴2滴(约0.10毫升)家用漂白剂,可提供足够的总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌消毒,同时在1个月的试验期内保持游离氯水平低于典型的味觉阈值,并提供足够的残留量。在弗吉尼亚州西南部和西弗吉尼亚州南部农村地区的路边泉水处,制作并分发了一张传达消毒协议和相应调查的信息图。大多数春季用户调查受访者(80%)表示,该信息图总体上很有帮助,超过一半的受访者表示他们会使用漂白剂协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信