Influence of harvest aid on soybean seed quality affected by delayed harvest and environment in Louisiana

Pub Date : 2023-03-25 DOI:10.1002/cft2.20221
Priscila Campos, Donnie Miller, Josh Copes, Melanie Netterville, Sebe Brown, Trey Price, David Moseley, Thanos Gentimis, Peters Egbedi, Rasel Parvej
{"title":"Influence of harvest aid on soybean seed quality affected by delayed harvest and environment in Louisiana","authors":"Priscila Campos,&nbsp;Donnie Miller,&nbsp;Josh Copes,&nbsp;Melanie Netterville,&nbsp;Sebe Brown,&nbsp;Trey Price,&nbsp;David Moseley,&nbsp;Thanos Gentimis,&nbsp;Peters Egbedi,&nbsp;Rasel Parvej","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Harvest aid application can expedite soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>) harvest and increase efficiency through both weed and crop desiccation and has become a common practice in Louisiana soybean production systems. Field studies in 2019–2020 evaluated the influence of harvest aid application (none, paraquat at 0.28 kg/ha, sodium chlorate at 6.72 kg/ha, or saflufenacil at 0.0498 kg/ha) on seed quality affected by delayed harvest (∼20, 30, or 44 days after optimum harvest timing, i.e., 13% seed moisture). Environment was investigated in both field (natural rainfall events) and environmentally controlled growth chambers (79 or 90°F with 30% or 100% relative humidity and exposed for 24, 48, 72, 96, or 144 h) for potential impacts of prolonged rainfall conditions on soybean seed quality at harvest. Seed quality was based on a rating scale of 1 to 10 where 1 means seed in good condition and 10 means seed in poor condition based on USDA reference images. Harvest aid application had no effect on soybean seed quality affected by delayed harvest and saturated (100% relative humidity) environment. Delaying harvest beyond approximately 20 days in the field past optimum harvest timing can result in reduced seed quality regardless of whether harvest aid application occurred (0.52–2 vs 4.18–5.91 rating). In addition, seedpod exposure to high relative humidity conditions (100%) for as little as 96 h after optimum harvest timing can result in severe seed quality issues (3.96 or greater rating) regardless of whether harvest aid was used.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.20221","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.20221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Harvest aid application can expedite soybean (Glycine max) harvest and increase efficiency through both weed and crop desiccation and has become a common practice in Louisiana soybean production systems. Field studies in 2019–2020 evaluated the influence of harvest aid application (none, paraquat at 0.28 kg/ha, sodium chlorate at 6.72 kg/ha, or saflufenacil at 0.0498 kg/ha) on seed quality affected by delayed harvest (∼20, 30, or 44 days after optimum harvest timing, i.e., 13% seed moisture). Environment was investigated in both field (natural rainfall events) and environmentally controlled growth chambers (79 or 90°F with 30% or 100% relative humidity and exposed for 24, 48, 72, 96, or 144 h) for potential impacts of prolonged rainfall conditions on soybean seed quality at harvest. Seed quality was based on a rating scale of 1 to 10 where 1 means seed in good condition and 10 means seed in poor condition based on USDA reference images. Harvest aid application had no effect on soybean seed quality affected by delayed harvest and saturated (100% relative humidity) environment. Delaying harvest beyond approximately 20 days in the field past optimum harvest timing can result in reduced seed quality regardless of whether harvest aid application occurred (0.52–2 vs 4.18–5.91 rating). In addition, seedpod exposure to high relative humidity conditions (100%) for as little as 96 h after optimum harvest timing can result in severe seed quality issues (3.96 or greater rating) regardless of whether harvest aid was used.

分享
查看原文
路易斯安那州收获援助对延迟收获和环境影响下大豆种子质量的影响
施用收割辅助剂可以通过杂草和作物干燥来加快大豆(大豆最大值)的收割并提高效率,这已成为路易斯安那州大豆生产系统的常见做法。2019-2020年的实地研究评估了施用收割辅助剂(无,0.28公斤/公顷的百草枯,6.72公斤/ha的氯酸钠,或0.0498公斤/公顷)对延迟收获(最佳收获时间后约20、30或44天,即13%的种子水分)影响的种子质量的影响。对田间(自然降雨事件)和环境控制生长室(79或90°F,相对湿度30%或100%,暴露24、48、72、96或144小时)的环境进行了调查,以了解长期降雨条件对收获大豆种子质量的潜在影响。种子质量基于美国农业部参考图像的1-10分等级,其中1表示状态良好的种子,10表示状态较差的种子。收获助剂的施用对延迟收获和饱和(100%相对湿度)环境影响的大豆种子质量没有影响。在超过最佳收获时间的情况下,将田间收获推迟约20天,可能会导致种子质量下降,无论是否使用收割辅助剂(0.52–2比4.18–5.91)。此外,无论是否使用收割辅助剂,在最佳收获时间后,将种子荚暴露在高相对湿度条件下(100%)长达96小时,都可能导致严重的种子质量问题(3.96或更高评级)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信