Criminal history inquiries and minority threat in the legal profession: An analysis of law school and state bar admission applications

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Law & Policy Pub Date : 2023-02-12 DOI:10.1111/lapo.12206
James M. Binnall, Nick Petersen
{"title":"Criminal history inquiries and minority threat in the legal profession: An analysis of law school and state bar admission applications","authors":"James M. Binnall,&nbsp;Nick Petersen","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While all but one U.S. law school and every state bar ask about criminal history on their admissions application, such inquiries vary considerably in the depth of information sought. One potential explanation for variations in the depth of criminal history inquiries among law schools and state bars relates to minority threat dynamics. Drawing on data quantifying the depth of criminal history inquiries for 190 ABA-approved law schools and all state bars, as well as school and state demographics, this study explores the issue for the first time. Negative binomial regressions reveal that law schools and state bars located in states with larger Black and Latino populations employ more probing criminal history inquiries. We also find that this relationship is parabolic—where the minority threat effect is negative in states with a critical mass of Black/Latino residents. Finally, minority threat effects for law school criminal history inquiries are moderated by state bar criminal history inquiries, suggesting that law schools are cued by state bar policies. These results provide some support for minority threat theory, informing debates about the continued use of criminal history inquiries to screen prospective law students and lawyers, and the inclusiveness of the legal profession generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":47050,"journal":{"name":"Law & Policy","volume":"45 1","pages":"4-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While all but one U.S. law school and every state bar ask about criminal history on their admissions application, such inquiries vary considerably in the depth of information sought. One potential explanation for variations in the depth of criminal history inquiries among law schools and state bars relates to minority threat dynamics. Drawing on data quantifying the depth of criminal history inquiries for 190 ABA-approved law schools and all state bars, as well as school and state demographics, this study explores the issue for the first time. Negative binomial regressions reveal that law schools and state bars located in states with larger Black and Latino populations employ more probing criminal history inquiries. We also find that this relationship is parabolic—where the minority threat effect is negative in states with a critical mass of Black/Latino residents. Finally, minority threat effects for law school criminal history inquiries are moderated by state bar criminal history inquiries, suggesting that law schools are cued by state bar policies. These results provide some support for minority threat theory, informing debates about the continued use of criminal history inquiries to screen prospective law students and lawyers, and the inclusiveness of the legal profession generally.

犯罪史调查与法律职业中的少数民族威胁:对法学院和州律师协会录取申请的分析
虽然除了一所美国法学院和每个州的律师外,其他所有大学都会在录取申请中询问犯罪史,但此类询问的信息深度差异很大。法学院和州立酒吧犯罪史调查深度差异的一个潜在解释与少数族裔威胁动态有关。本研究利用量化190所美国律师协会批准的法学院和所有州立酒吧犯罪史调查深度的数据,以及学校和州的人口统计数据,首次探讨了这个问题。负二项回归显示,黑人和拉丁裔人口较多的州的法学院和州立酒吧采用了更多的犯罪史调查。我们还发现,这种关系是抛物线型的——在黑人/拉丁裔居民数量达到临界水平的州,少数族裔的威胁效应是负面的。最后,州律师协会犯罪史调查调节了法学院犯罪史调查的少数群体威胁效应,表明法学院受到州律师协会政策的启发。这些结果为少数群体威胁理论提供了一些支持,为继续使用犯罪史调查来筛选未来的法律学生和律师,以及法律职业的普遍包容性的辩论提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: International and interdisciplinary in scope, Law & Policy embraces varied research methodologies that interrogate law, governance, and public policy worldwide. Law & Policy makes a vital contribution to the current dialogue on contemporary policy by publishing innovative, peer-reviewed articles on such critical topics as • government and self-regulation • health • environment • family • gender • taxation and finance • legal decision-making • criminal justice • human rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信