Effect of requirements specification using native language on external software quality

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
IET Software Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1049/sfw2.12124
Fernando Uyaguari, Cathy Guevara-Vega, Antonio Quiña-Mera, Alvaro Uyaguari, Cristina Acosta
{"title":"Effect of requirements specification using native language on external software quality","authors":"Fernando Uyaguari,&nbsp;Cathy Guevara-Vega,&nbsp;Antonio Quiña-Mera,&nbsp;Alvaro Uyaguari,&nbsp;Cristina Acosta","doi":"10.1049/sfw2.12124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the context of requirements specification in Global Software Development, aspects such as differences in culture, language and schedule affect software development teams; however, we do not know the effect of these issues. Compare the native language requirements with the foreign language requirements concerning external quality. We conducted a controlled experiment of one-factor two treatments within-subjects with 17 experimental subjects. Wilcoxon test indicates that there is evidence to reject the null hypothesis (<i>p</i>-value = 0.008); there is a statistically significant difference. The external quality value obtained with native language requirements is superior to the external quality produced with the foreign language. The effect size equals an absolute value of 0.45, which corresponds to a medium effect. The language used in the requirements specification influences the external quality; using the native language in the requirements specification significantly increases the external quality. The result obtained in this research should be considered to evaluate the roles and English language skills of GSD team members and their effect on external software quality. We also suggest considering the English language skills of the experimental subjects in the experimental laboratories since language could influence the results of the experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50378,"journal":{"name":"IET Software","volume":"17 3","pages":"287-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/sfw2.12124","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/sfw2.12124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of requirements specification in Global Software Development, aspects such as differences in culture, language and schedule affect software development teams; however, we do not know the effect of these issues. Compare the native language requirements with the foreign language requirements concerning external quality. We conducted a controlled experiment of one-factor two treatments within-subjects with 17 experimental subjects. Wilcoxon test indicates that there is evidence to reject the null hypothesis (p-value = 0.008); there is a statistically significant difference. The external quality value obtained with native language requirements is superior to the external quality produced with the foreign language. The effect size equals an absolute value of 0.45, which corresponds to a medium effect. The language used in the requirements specification influences the external quality; using the native language in the requirements specification significantly increases the external quality. The result obtained in this research should be considered to evaluate the roles and English language skills of GSD team members and their effect on external software quality. We also suggest considering the English language skills of the experimental subjects in the experimental laboratories since language could influence the results of the experiments.

Abstract Image

使用母语的需求规范对外部软件质量的影响
在全球软件开发的需求规范中,文化、语言和时间表的差异等方面会影响软件开发团队;然而,我们不知道这些问题的影响。比较母语要求和外语要求的外部质量。我们对17名受试者进行了一项一因素二治疗的对照实验。Wilcoxon检验表明有证据拒绝零假设(p值=0.008);存在统计学上显著的差异。用母语要求获得的外部质量值优于用外语产生的外部质量。效果大小等于0.45的绝对值,这对应于中等效果。需求规范中使用的语言会影响外部质量;在需求规范中使用母语可以显著提高外部质量。本研究的结果应用于评估GSD团队成员的角色和英语技能,以及他们对外部软件质量的影响。我们还建议在实验实验室考虑实验对象的英语语言技能,因为语言会影响实验结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IET Software
IET Software 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IET Software publishes papers on all aspects of the software lifecycle, including design, development, implementation and maintenance. The focus of the journal is on the methods used to develop and maintain software, and their practical application. Authors are especially encouraged to submit papers on the following topics, although papers on all aspects of software engineering are welcome: Software and systems requirements engineering Formal methods, design methods, practice and experience Software architecture, aspect and object orientation, reuse and re-engineering Testing, verification and validation techniques Software dependability and measurement Human systems engineering and human-computer interaction Knowledge engineering; expert and knowledge-based systems, intelligent agents Information systems engineering Application of software engineering in industry and commerce Software engineering technology transfer Management of software development Theoretical aspects of software development Machine learning Big data and big code Cloud computing Current Special Issue. Call for papers: Knowledge Discovery for Software Development - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_SEN_CFP_KDSD.pdf Big Data Analytics for Sustainable Software Development - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_SEN_CFP_BDASSD.pdf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信