{"title":"Training design enhancement through training evaluation: Effects on training transfer","authors":"Elham Arabi PhD, Tiberio Garza PhD","doi":"10.1111/ijtd.12295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research investigates the linkage between training evaluation, learning design and training transfer. A new training evaluation model, (i.e., learning-transfer evaluation model [LTEM]), was used to examine its ability to provide evaluative evidence through robust assessments in pre-, post- and delayed assessments. The model was used to improve the training design of a nursing training programme and to nudge the stakeholders to change their training practices. A mixed-methods research approach, called convergent parallel, was employed to study the influence of the LTEM model in training design improvement by assessing the perceptions of nurse trainees, trainers and a nurse educator towards the instructional design of the training programme. A quantitative approach was used to examine the extent to which the improved programme using an iterative design cycle would result in improved performance among four groups (i.e., one baseline and three treatment groups). The integrated data showed that the LTEM model influenced the stakeholders to focus more on skills practice. With this shift of mindset, the training design was enhanced based on the principles of learning design, cognitive science and multimedia principles. Results of the pre-, post- and delayed posttests showed higher mean scores in the three treatment groups compared to the baseline group. For the measure of transfer, while the treatment groups scored higher, there was no statistically significant difference among all four groups. This could be attributed to nurses’ varied levels of experience, negative transfer and the use of different evaluation matrices in the study and by the hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":46817,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Training and Development","volume":"27 2","pages":"191-219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Training and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijtd.12295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research investigates the linkage between training evaluation, learning design and training transfer. A new training evaluation model, (i.e., learning-transfer evaluation model [LTEM]), was used to examine its ability to provide evaluative evidence through robust assessments in pre-, post- and delayed assessments. The model was used to improve the training design of a nursing training programme and to nudge the stakeholders to change their training practices. A mixed-methods research approach, called convergent parallel, was employed to study the influence of the LTEM model in training design improvement by assessing the perceptions of nurse trainees, trainers and a nurse educator towards the instructional design of the training programme. A quantitative approach was used to examine the extent to which the improved programme using an iterative design cycle would result in improved performance among four groups (i.e., one baseline and three treatment groups). The integrated data showed that the LTEM model influenced the stakeholders to focus more on skills practice. With this shift of mindset, the training design was enhanced based on the principles of learning design, cognitive science and multimedia principles. Results of the pre-, post- and delayed posttests showed higher mean scores in the three treatment groups compared to the baseline group. For the measure of transfer, while the treatment groups scored higher, there was no statistically significant difference among all four groups. This could be attributed to nurses’ varied levels of experience, negative transfer and the use of different evaluation matrices in the study and by the hospital.
期刊介绍:
Increasing international competition has led governments and corporations to focus on ways of improving national and corporate economic performance. The effective use of human resources is seen as a prerequisite, and the training and development of employees as paramount. The growth of training and development as an academic subject reflects its growth in practice. The International Journal of Training and Development is an international forum for the reporting of high-quality, original, empirical research. Multidisciplinary, international and comparative, the journal publishes research which ranges from the theoretical, conceptual and methodological to more policy-oriented types of work. The scope of the Journal is training and development, broadly defined. This includes: The determinants of training specifying and testing the explanatory variables which may be related to training identifying and analysing specific factors which give rise to a need for training and development as well as the processes by which those needs become defined, for example, training needs analysis the need for performance improvement the training and development implications of various performance improvement techniques, such as appraisal and assessment the analysis of competence Training and development practice the design, development and delivery of training the learning and development process itself competency-based approaches evaluation: the relationship between training and individual, corporate and macroeconomic performance Policy and strategy organisational aspects of training and development public policy issues questions of infrastructure issues relating to the training and development profession The Journal’s scope encompasses both corporate and public policy analysis. International and comparative work is particularly welcome, as is research which embraces emerging issues and developments.