Judicial decision-making in family court involving children with autism spectrum disorder

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Emilie Lahaie, Karine Poitras, Rachel Birnbaum
{"title":"Judicial decision-making in family court involving children with autism spectrum disorder","authors":"Emilie Lahaie,&nbsp;Karine Poitras,&nbsp;Rachel Birnbaum","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children and adolescents has increased over the past decade. Consequently, the courts and experts are more likely to be exposed to these children whose needs are highly heterogeneous. The present study aims to document judicial decision-making about children with autism spectrum as well as the parenting recommendations made by experts involved in these cases. There were 104 court decisions reviewed in Quebec over the past ten years. The results show that 85.6% of the decisions included a child custody assessment and that judges are more likely to order primary care to mother (56%). However, shared parenting (27%) and primary care to the father (17%) were also ordered in disputes involving an autistic child. Bivariate analyses revealed that challenges with parental monitoring and supervision were associated with court-ordered parenting arrangements. The present study revealed that a child custody assessment as well as father custody are more often observed than in the general population. This study highlights the need for further research to shed light on the best interests of children with ASD following the separation of their parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"61 4","pages":"854-869"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children and adolescents has increased over the past decade. Consequently, the courts and experts are more likely to be exposed to these children whose needs are highly heterogeneous. The present study aims to document judicial decision-making about children with autism spectrum as well as the parenting recommendations made by experts involved in these cases. There were 104 court decisions reviewed in Quebec over the past ten years. The results show that 85.6% of the decisions included a child custody assessment and that judges are more likely to order primary care to mother (56%). However, shared parenting (27%) and primary care to the father (17%) were also ordered in disputes involving an autistic child. Bivariate analyses revealed that challenges with parental monitoring and supervision were associated with court-ordered parenting arrangements. The present study revealed that a child custody assessment as well as father custody are more often observed than in the general population. This study highlights the need for further research to shed light on the best interests of children with ASD following the separation of their parents.

涉及自闭症谱系障碍儿童的家庭法庭司法决策
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)在儿童和青少年中的患病率在过去十年中有所上升。因此,法院和专家更有可能接触到这些需求高度多样化的儿童。本研究旨在记录有关自闭症谱系儿童的司法决策,以及参与这些案件的专家提出的育儿建议。在过去十年中,魁北克省共审查了104项法院判决。结果显示,85.6%的判决包括儿童监护权评估,法官更有可能下令对母亲进行初级护理(56%)。然而,在涉及自闭症儿童的纠纷中,父母共同抚养(27%)和父亲初级保健(17%)也被要求。双变量分析显示,父母监督和监督方面的挑战与法院命令的育儿安排有关。本研究表明,与普通人群相比,儿童监护权评估和父亲监护权更常见。这项研究强调了进一步研究的必要性,以阐明自闭症谱系障碍儿童在父母分离后的最大利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信