Training parenting plan evaluators: Looking towards the future

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Robert L. Kaufman, Robin M. Deutsch, April Harris-Britt
{"title":"Training parenting plan evaluators: Looking towards the future","authors":"Robert L. Kaufman,&nbsp;Robin M. Deutsch,&nbsp;April Harris-Britt","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Standards of practice for parenting plan evaluations continue to evolve, informed by advances in research and the development of innovative, evidence-based approaches to assessment and intervention. Parenting plan evaluators are asked to inform the court, parents, and other professionals on how to address the complex needs of increasingly diverse families amid reorganization, high conflict, and crisis. How can we attract and properly train new mental health professionals to do important work in an increasingly strained adversarial system? How can evaluators keep up with these advances over the course of their careers? How can they deepen and refine their skills to work with a diverse array of individuals, family constellations and an enormous range of family circumstances? And how can evaluators care for their own well-being and their colleagues? In this article, the authors describe a multi-dimensional approach to training both new and experienced custody evaluators that includes imparting baseline knowledge on how to conduct quality parenting plan evaluations as a starting point. We discuss a variety of modalities and approaches that can enable evaluators to deepen and expand their skills over the years, contribute to the diverse community of family law professionals, and manage the exceptional demands of working in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"61 4","pages":"719-733"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Standards of practice for parenting plan evaluations continue to evolve, informed by advances in research and the development of innovative, evidence-based approaches to assessment and intervention. Parenting plan evaluators are asked to inform the court, parents, and other professionals on how to address the complex needs of increasingly diverse families amid reorganization, high conflict, and crisis. How can we attract and properly train new mental health professionals to do important work in an increasingly strained adversarial system? How can evaluators keep up with these advances over the course of their careers? How can they deepen and refine their skills to work with a diverse array of individuals, family constellations and an enormous range of family circumstances? And how can evaluators care for their own well-being and their colleagues? In this article, the authors describe a multi-dimensional approach to training both new and experienced custody evaluators that includes imparting baseline knowledge on how to conduct quality parenting plan evaluations as a starting point. We discuss a variety of modalities and approaches that can enable evaluators to deepen and expand their skills over the years, contribute to the diverse community of family law professionals, and manage the exceptional demands of working in this field.

培训育儿计划评估员:展望未来
育儿计划评估的实践标准在不断发展,这得益于研究的进展以及评估和干预的创新、循证方法的发展。育儿计划评估人员被要求告知法院、父母和其他专业人员,如何在重组、高度冲突和危机中解决日益多样化的家庭的复杂需求。我们如何吸引并适当培训新的心理健康专业人员,让他们在日益紧张的对抗性系统中从事重要工作?评估人员如何在职业生涯中跟上这些进步?他们如何深化和完善自己的技能,以便与各种各样的个人、家庭星座和各种各样的家庭环境合作?评估人员如何关心自己和同事的福祉?在这篇文章中,作者描述了一种多维度的方法来培训新的和有经验的监护评估人员,包括传授如何进行高质量育儿计划评估的基线知识作为起点。我们讨论了各种模式和方法,这些模式和方法可以使评估人员多年来加深和扩大他们的技能,为不同的家庭法专业人员社区做出贡献,并满足在这一领域工作的特殊需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信