Heartbreaking anthropology hurts: Studying fertility rituals while struggling with infertility

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Indira Arumugam
{"title":"Heartbreaking anthropology hurts: Studying fertility rituals while struggling with infertility","authors":"Indira Arumugam","doi":"10.1111/anhu.12425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Ethnography involves using the self as the mechanism to try to understand others and their life worlds. How is knowledge and knowledge production affected by the apparatus of knowing, the ethnographer experiencing cataclysms in their personal life? In this article, I grapple with the fraught dilemmas of doing fieldwork on mother goddesses and ritual cults premised on the cultivation of fertility while experiencing infertility and undergoing assisted reproductive treatments (ART). My recovery from pregnancy losses and fertility failures was compromised by my research on fertility, which continuously resurrected my trauma. Juxtaposing research on ritual technologies with personal experience of biomedical treatments—different means to overcome the limits of nature to bring about reproductive success—I foreground the ceding of human control and agency demanded by both therapies. My ethnographic writing similarly loosened to admit emotions, ambivalences, and absences that I had normally excluded or edited out. Even as it provokes theoretical insights, to keep probing ongoing personal trauma has become unbearable. To salve heartbreak and to salvage some control has warranted rebuilding a few of the enclosures keeping the personal away from the professional.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53597,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Humanism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Humanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anhu.12425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Ethnography involves using the self as the mechanism to try to understand others and their life worlds. How is knowledge and knowledge production affected by the apparatus of knowing, the ethnographer experiencing cataclysms in their personal life? In this article, I grapple with the fraught dilemmas of doing fieldwork on mother goddesses and ritual cults premised on the cultivation of fertility while experiencing infertility and undergoing assisted reproductive treatments (ART). My recovery from pregnancy losses and fertility failures was compromised by my research on fertility, which continuously resurrected my trauma. Juxtaposing research on ritual technologies with personal experience of biomedical treatments—different means to overcome the limits of nature to bring about reproductive success—I foreground the ceding of human control and agency demanded by both therapies. My ethnographic writing similarly loosened to admit emotions, ambivalences, and absences that I had normally excluded or edited out. Even as it provokes theoretical insights, to keep probing ongoing personal trauma has become unbearable. To salve heartbreak and to salvage some control has warranted rebuilding a few of the enclosures keeping the personal away from the professional.

令人心碎的人类学伤害:在与不孕不育作斗争的同时研究生育仪式
民族志包括使用自我作为机制,试图理解他人和他们的生活世界。民族志学家在个人生活中经历了灾难,知识和知识生产是如何受到知识的影响的?在这篇文章中,我努力解决在经历不孕不育和接受辅助生殖治疗(ART)的同时,对母亲女神和以培养生育能力为前提的仪式崇拜进行实地调查的令人担忧的困境。我从流产和生育失败中恢复过来的过程受到了我对生育能力的研究的影响,这不断地恢复了我的创伤。将仪式技术的研究与生物医学治疗的个人经验结合起来——这是克服自然限制以实现生殖成功的不同手段——我展望了两种疗法所要求的人类控制和能动性的放弃。我的民族志写作同样放松了,承认了我通常排除或编辑掉的情绪、矛盾和缺席。尽管它引发了理论上的见解,但继续探究持续的个人创伤已经变得难以忍受。为了缓解心碎和挽救一些控制权,有必要重建一些围栏,让个人远离专业人士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anthropology and Humanism
Anthropology and Humanism Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信