Jeffrey A. DiBartolomeo, Michael G. Kothakota, Elizabeth J. Parks-Stamm, Derek T. Tharp
{"title":"Racial animosity and Black financial advisor underrepresentation","authors":"Jeffrey A. DiBartolomeo, Michael G. Kothakota, Elizabeth J. Parks-Stamm, Derek T. Tharp","doi":"10.1002/cfp2.1164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study provides compelling evidence for Black underrepresenation in the financial advisor industry. Using a dataset of all U.S. securities-licensed individuals (<i>N</i> = 642,543), we first estimate the racial and ethnic composition of the industry using an algorithm that accounts for name, gender, and location. Second, we use a dataset enhanced by a commercial vendor to restrict the analysis to only those identified as working as financial advisors (<i>n</i> = 237,435). Using Google search volume for a racial epithet as a proxy for area racism, we find that greater racism in a market is associated with greater Black advisor underrepresentation. Overall, we estimate at the individual level that 10.1% of financial advisors are Black (relative to 13.4% of the U.S. population). Furthermore, our results suggest market-level racial animosity toward Blacks is negatively associated with Black advisor representation. We estimate a difference of 0.9 percentage points when comparing markets with the highest and lowest levels of animosity. For the average market with an estimated 11.4% Black advisor representation, an increase of 0.9 percentage points would represent a 7.9% increase in Black advisor representation.</p>","PeriodicalId":100529,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cfp2.1164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study provides compelling evidence for Black underrepresenation in the financial advisor industry. Using a dataset of all U.S. securities-licensed individuals (N = 642,543), we first estimate the racial and ethnic composition of the industry using an algorithm that accounts for name, gender, and location. Second, we use a dataset enhanced by a commercial vendor to restrict the analysis to only those identified as working as financial advisors (n = 237,435). Using Google search volume for a racial epithet as a proxy for area racism, we find that greater racism in a market is associated with greater Black advisor underrepresentation. Overall, we estimate at the individual level that 10.1% of financial advisors are Black (relative to 13.4% of the U.S. population). Furthermore, our results suggest market-level racial animosity toward Blacks is negatively associated with Black advisor representation. We estimate a difference of 0.9 percentage points when comparing markets with the highest and lowest levels of animosity. For the average market with an estimated 11.4% Black advisor representation, an increase of 0.9 percentage points would represent a 7.9% increase in Black advisor representation.