Searching for a cost-effective method of determining sorption properties for the industrial use of CO2 capture

IF 2.1 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marek Staf, Veronika Kyselová
{"title":"Searching for a cost-effective method of determining sorption properties for the industrial use of CO2 capture","authors":"Marek Staf,&nbsp;Veronika Kyselová","doi":"10.1007/s11696-023-02933-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study focuses on laboratory testing of carbon-dioxide adsorption. It compares three methods used to determine the capacity of the adsorbents proposed for CO<sub>2</sub> capture. The tests have been performed on two samples, namely natural clinoptilolite and a 13X molecular sieve. Two methods were dynamic and one was static. The first dynamic method evaluated the capacity based on the change in CO<sub>2</sub> volume fraction before and after a fixed-bed adsorber. For the same purpose, the second dynamic method used a gravimetric procedure. The static method detected a change in pressure during CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption. The capacities determined for carbon-dioxide mole fractions of 5, 10, 13 and 20% at temperatures of 30 and 40 °C at atmospheric pressure were compared. The apparatus with a fixed-bed adsorber made it possible to perform tests also for overpressures of 2 and 5 bar and lower temperatures. The capacity obtained on the three apparatuses showed good agreement. The maximum capacity (3.32 mmol g<sup>−1</sup>) was determined for the 13X sample at 10 °C and a partial CO<sub>2</sub> pressure of 120 kPa and, conversely, the lowest (0.12 mmol g<sup>−1</sup>) for clinoptilolite at 40 °C and a partial CO<sub>2</sub> pressure of 5 kPa. There was no significant difference in capacity standard deviations between the apparatus (0.014–0.036 mmol g<sup>−1</sup>). The fixed-bed apparatus required one to three orders of magnitude more gas for the experiment and was more challenging to operate and evaluate the data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55265,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Papers","volume":"77 10","pages":"6217 - 6233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11696-023-02933-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Papers","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11696-023-02933-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study focuses on laboratory testing of carbon-dioxide adsorption. It compares three methods used to determine the capacity of the adsorbents proposed for CO2 capture. The tests have been performed on two samples, namely natural clinoptilolite and a 13X molecular sieve. Two methods were dynamic and one was static. The first dynamic method evaluated the capacity based on the change in CO2 volume fraction before and after a fixed-bed adsorber. For the same purpose, the second dynamic method used a gravimetric procedure. The static method detected a change in pressure during CO2 adsorption. The capacities determined for carbon-dioxide mole fractions of 5, 10, 13 and 20% at temperatures of 30 and 40 °C at atmospheric pressure were compared. The apparatus with a fixed-bed adsorber made it possible to perform tests also for overpressures of 2 and 5 bar and lower temperatures. The capacity obtained on the three apparatuses showed good agreement. The maximum capacity (3.32 mmol g−1) was determined for the 13X sample at 10 °C and a partial CO2 pressure of 120 kPa and, conversely, the lowest (0.12 mmol g−1) for clinoptilolite at 40 °C and a partial CO2 pressure of 5 kPa. There was no significant difference in capacity standard deviations between the apparatus (0.014–0.036 mmol g−1). The fixed-bed apparatus required one to three orders of magnitude more gas for the experiment and was more challenging to operate and evaluate the data.

寻找一种具有成本效益的方法来确定二氧化碳捕获工业用途的吸附特性
本研究的重点是二氧化碳吸附的实验室测试。它比较了用于确定提出的吸附剂捕获二氧化碳的能力的三种方法。对两种样品进行了测试,即天然斜沸石和13X分子筛。两种方法是动态的,一种是静态的。第一种动态方法是根据固定床吸附器前后CO2体积分数的变化来评估容量。出于同样的目的,第二种动态方法使用了重力法。静态方法检测CO2吸附过程中压力的变化。比较了在30°C和40°C大气压下测定的二氧化碳摩尔分数为5、10、13和20%的容量。带有固定床吸附器的仪器还可以对2巴和5巴的超压以及更低的温度进行测试。在三种仪器上得到的容量显示出很好的一致性。13X样品在10°C和120 kPa的CO2分压下的最大容量为3.32 mmol g−1,相反,斜沸石在40°C和5 kPa的CO2分压下的最低容量为0.12 mmol g−1。两种仪器的容量标准偏差无显著差异(0.014-0.036 mmol g−1)。固定床装置需要多一到三个数量级的气体进行实验,操作和评估数据更具挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical Papers
Chemical Papers 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
590
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Papers is a peer-reviewed, international journal devoted to basic and applied chemical research. It has a broad scope covering the chemical sciences, but favors interdisciplinary research and studies that bring chemistry together with other disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信