{"title":"Market orientation (once again): Challenges and a suggested solution","authors":"Aksel I. Rokkan","doi":"10.1007/s13162-022-00235-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research shows almost unequivocally that market orientation (MO) has positive performance consequences for companies. However, research conceptualizes MO as (potentially) too abstract and broad. Consequently, detecting negative performance implications from it is difficult. In this article, I propose to deconstruct MO. First, rather than operating MO as an integrated construct, I suggest treating MO as a class of orientations that share certain properties but differ on important others. I detail the competitive logic of and main risks related to alternative MOs and, drawing from literature on marketing, economics, and strategy, suggest contingencies for alternative MOs to perform well. Second, I propose measuring each individual MO (e.g., customer-centric) as a product of the two forms of orientations (strategy/plan and information) embedded within it. This suggested measurement approach enables further scrutiny of the association between MO and company performance. I conclude with a discussion of the potential implications for research and marketing management which could result from treating MO as a construct class.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"13 1-2","pages":"71 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13162-022-00235-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-022-00235-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Previous research shows almost unequivocally that market orientation (MO) has positive performance consequences for companies. However, research conceptualizes MO as (potentially) too abstract and broad. Consequently, detecting negative performance implications from it is difficult. In this article, I propose to deconstruct MO. First, rather than operating MO as an integrated construct, I suggest treating MO as a class of orientations that share certain properties but differ on important others. I detail the competitive logic of and main risks related to alternative MOs and, drawing from literature on marketing, economics, and strategy, suggest contingencies for alternative MOs to perform well. Second, I propose measuring each individual MO (e.g., customer-centric) as a product of the two forms of orientations (strategy/plan and information) embedded within it. This suggested measurement approach enables further scrutiny of the association between MO and company performance. I conclude with a discussion of the potential implications for research and marketing management which could result from treating MO as a construct class.
AMS ReviewBusiness, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍:
The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication. The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.