Formalizing service-dominant logic as a general theory of markets: taking stock and moving forward

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Melissa Archpru Akaka, Kaisa Koskela-Huotari, Stephen L. Vargo
{"title":"Formalizing service-dominant logic as a general theory of markets: taking stock and moving forward","authors":"Melissa Archpru Akaka,&nbsp;Kaisa Koskela-Huotari,&nbsp;Stephen L. Vargo","doi":"10.1007/s13162-021-00214-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Advancement of the marketing discipline requires a marketing-based, general theory of markets. However, most academic marketing is developed from normative theories of economics and direct application of psychological and sociological theories. Indigenous marketing theories about markets are rare but can increase the relevance of marketing scholarship. Although theories are never fully finalized, theoretical formalizing processes can establish a general framework for theory development on markets. The aim of this paper is to provide a conceptual base for a general theory of markets by explicating the ongoing progression toward formalization of service-dominant (S-D) logic. We outline a recursive, cocreative process of theory formalization to take stock of the status of S-D logic’s development so far—what has been done and what we know and don’t know about markets. We propose specific areas of inquiry and research directions for moving forward in developing a general theory of markets that is indigenous to marketing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"11 3-4","pages":"375 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-021-00214-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Advancement of the marketing discipline requires a marketing-based, general theory of markets. However, most academic marketing is developed from normative theories of economics and direct application of psychological and sociological theories. Indigenous marketing theories about markets are rare but can increase the relevance of marketing scholarship. Although theories are never fully finalized, theoretical formalizing processes can establish a general framework for theory development on markets. The aim of this paper is to provide a conceptual base for a general theory of markets by explicating the ongoing progression toward formalization of service-dominant (S-D) logic. We outline a recursive, cocreative process of theory formalization to take stock of the status of S-D logic’s development so far—what has been done and what we know and don’t know about markets. We propose specific areas of inquiry and research directions for moving forward in developing a general theory of markets that is indigenous to marketing.

Abstract Image

将服务主导逻辑形式化为市场的一般理论:评估和前进
市场营销学科的发展需要基于市场营销的一般市场理论。然而,大多数学术营销都是从经济学的规范理论和心理学和社会学理论的直接应用中发展起来的。关于市场的本土营销理论很少见,但可以提高营销学术的相关性。尽管理论从未完全定型,但理论形式化过程可以为市场理论发展建立一个通用框架。本文的目的是通过解释服务主导(S-D)逻辑的形式化进程,为市场的一般理论提供一个概念基础。我们概述了一个递归的、共同创造的理论形式化过程,以评估迄今为止S-D逻辑的发展状况——已经做了什么,我们对市场的了解和不了解。我们提出了具体的调查领域和研究方向,以推动发展市场营销的一般理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AMS Review
AMS Review Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication.  The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信