Melissa Archpru Akaka, Kaisa Koskela-Huotari, Stephen L. Vargo
{"title":"Formalizing service-dominant logic as a general theory of markets: taking stock and moving forward","authors":"Melissa Archpru Akaka, Kaisa Koskela-Huotari, Stephen L. Vargo","doi":"10.1007/s13162-021-00214-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Advancement of the marketing discipline requires a marketing-based, general theory of markets. However, most academic marketing is developed from normative theories of economics and direct application of psychological and sociological theories. Indigenous marketing theories about markets are rare but can increase the relevance of marketing scholarship. Although theories are never fully finalized, theoretical formalizing processes can establish a general framework for theory development on markets. The aim of this paper is to provide a conceptual base for a general theory of markets by explicating the ongoing progression toward formalization of service-dominant (S-D) logic. We outline a recursive, cocreative process of theory formalization to take stock of the status of S-D logic’s development so far—what has been done and what we know and don’t know about markets. We propose specific areas of inquiry and research directions for moving forward in developing a general theory of markets that is indigenous to marketing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"11 3-4","pages":"375 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-021-00214-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Abstract
Advancement of the marketing discipline requires a marketing-based, general theory of markets. However, most academic marketing is developed from normative theories of economics and direct application of psychological and sociological theories. Indigenous marketing theories about markets are rare but can increase the relevance of marketing scholarship. Although theories are never fully finalized, theoretical formalizing processes can establish a general framework for theory development on markets. The aim of this paper is to provide a conceptual base for a general theory of markets by explicating the ongoing progression toward formalization of service-dominant (S-D) logic. We outline a recursive, cocreative process of theory formalization to take stock of the status of S-D logic’s development so far—what has been done and what we know and don’t know about markets. We propose specific areas of inquiry and research directions for moving forward in developing a general theory of markets that is indigenous to marketing.
AMS ReviewBusiness, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍:
The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication. The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.