Re-institutionalizing marketing

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Thomas Martin Key, Terry Clark, O. C. Ferrell, David W. Stewart, Leyland Pitt
{"title":"Re-institutionalizing marketing","authors":"Thomas Martin Key,&nbsp;Terry Clark,&nbsp;O. C. Ferrell,&nbsp;David W. Stewart,&nbsp;Leyland Pitt","doi":"10.1007/s13162-021-00220-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hunt’s (AMS Rev, 10, 189–198, 2020) notion of the re-institutionalization of marketing as a discipline provides the background for this commentary. This forward-looking context is used to address issues the marketing discipline is facing to reconcile problems we identify. Academic marketing research has become fragmented and polarized into narrow areas that do not provide holistic contributions to knowledge. Doctoral programs are focusing less on core marketing knowledge and theory and more on methodology. This brings into question the culture of both our doctoral programs and the culture of the discipline to provide high-impact research valuable to practitioners and society, as well as the firm. An agenda for change addresses hiring practices, projects, methods, and oversight on the importance of impact. It is suggested the marketing discipline engage in the study of marketing practice to find important problems to investigate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"11 3-4","pages":"446 - 453"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-021-00220-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Hunt’s (AMS Rev, 10, 189–198, 2020) notion of the re-institutionalization of marketing as a discipline provides the background for this commentary. This forward-looking context is used to address issues the marketing discipline is facing to reconcile problems we identify. Academic marketing research has become fragmented and polarized into narrow areas that do not provide holistic contributions to knowledge. Doctoral programs are focusing less on core marketing knowledge and theory and more on methodology. This brings into question the culture of both our doctoral programs and the culture of the discipline to provide high-impact research valuable to practitioners and society, as well as the firm. An agenda for change addresses hiring practices, projects, methods, and oversight on the importance of impact. It is suggested the marketing discipline engage in the study of marketing practice to find important problems to investigate.

Re-institutionalizing营销
Hunt(AMS Rev,10189-1982020)认为营销作为一门学科的重新制度化为这篇评论提供了背景。这种前瞻性的背景用于解决营销学科面临的问题,以调和我们发现的问题。学术营销研究已经变得支离破碎,两极分化,进入了狭窄的领域,无法为知识提供全面的贡献。博士项目较少关注核心营销知识和理论,而更多关注方法论。这就对我们的博士项目文化和学科文化提出了质疑,即为从业者、社会和公司提供有价值的高影响力研究。变革议程涉及招聘实践、项目、方法以及对影响重要性的监督。建议市场营销学专业从事市场营销实践的研究,找出需要研究的重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AMS Review
AMS Review Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication.  The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信