A Comparison of Machine Health Indicators Based on the Impulsiveness of Vibration Signals

IF 1.7 4区 物理与天体物理
Bingchang Hou, Dong Wang, Tongtong Yan, Zhike Peng
{"title":"A Comparison of Machine Health Indicators Based on the Impulsiveness of Vibration Signals","authors":"Bingchang Hou,&nbsp;Dong Wang,&nbsp;Tongtong Yan,&nbsp;Zhike Peng","doi":"10.1007/s40857-021-00224-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vibration signals collected from machines can contain rich machine degradation information, such as impulsiveness and cyclo-stationarity. In the field of machine condition monitoring (MCM), quantification of impulsiveness has attracted many researchers’ interests because impulsiveness often indicates an occurrence of incipient faults. Impulsiveness-based health indicators (HIs) (e.g., Gini index, kurtosis, entropy, smoothness index, etc.) are some kinds of statistical parameters that can quantify the impulsiveness of vibration signals. Hence, they have been widely studied during recent years for MCM. However, a thorough comparitive study of those HIs is seldom reported. This paper aims to compare seven impulsiveness-based HIs including kurtosis, skewness, smoothness index, negative entropy, Gini index, Hoyer measure, and the ratio of L2 to L1 norm for MCM according to three properties including the robustness to the length of a signal, the gradient for sparsity or impulsiveness, and quantification of impulsiveness and cyclo-stationarity. Among the seven HIs, it was experimentally found that the Gini index is better than the other indicators to satisfy the three suggested properties for MCM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54355,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40857-021-00224-7","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics Australia","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40857-021-00224-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Vibration signals collected from machines can contain rich machine degradation information, such as impulsiveness and cyclo-stationarity. In the field of machine condition monitoring (MCM), quantification of impulsiveness has attracted many researchers’ interests because impulsiveness often indicates an occurrence of incipient faults. Impulsiveness-based health indicators (HIs) (e.g., Gini index, kurtosis, entropy, smoothness index, etc.) are some kinds of statistical parameters that can quantify the impulsiveness of vibration signals. Hence, they have been widely studied during recent years for MCM. However, a thorough comparitive study of those HIs is seldom reported. This paper aims to compare seven impulsiveness-based HIs including kurtosis, skewness, smoothness index, negative entropy, Gini index, Hoyer measure, and the ratio of L2 to L1 norm for MCM according to three properties including the robustness to the length of a signal, the gradient for sparsity or impulsiveness, and quantification of impulsiveness and cyclo-stationarity. Among the seven HIs, it was experimentally found that the Gini index is better than the other indicators to satisfy the three suggested properties for MCM.

基于振动信号冲动性的机器健康指标比较
从机器上采集到的振动信号可以包含丰富的机器退化信息,如冲动性和循环平稳性。在机器状态监测(MCM)领域,冲动性的量化引起了许多研究者的兴趣,因为冲动性往往预示着早期故障的发生。基于冲动性的健康指标(HIs),如基尼指数、峰度、熵、平滑度指数等,是量化振动信号冲动性的统计参数。因此,近年来对MCM进行了广泛的研究。然而,对其进行深入的比较研究却鲜有报道。本文旨在根据对信号长度的鲁棒性、稀疏性或冲动性的梯度、冲动性和循环平稳性的量化等三个性质,对MCM的峰度、偏度、平滑指数、负熵、基尼指数、Hoyer测度和L2范数之比等7种基于冲动性的HIs进行比较。在7个HIs中,实验发现基尼指数比其他指标更能满足MCM的3个建议属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acoustics Australia
Acoustics Australia ACOUSTICS-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Acoustics Australia, the journal of the Australian Acoustical Society, has been publishing high quality research and technical papers in all areas of acoustics since commencement in 1972. The target audience for the journal includes both researchers and practitioners. It aims to publish papers and technical notes that are relevant to current acoustics and of interest to members of the Society. These include but are not limited to: Architectural and Building Acoustics, Environmental Noise, Underwater Acoustics, Engineering Noise and Vibration Control, Occupational Noise Management, Hearing, Musical Acoustics.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信