Lessons from the 2023 doctoral competition for conceptual articles: Identifying, nurturing, and publishing

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting

AMS Review Pub Date : 2023-06-07 DOI:10.1007/s13162-023-00259-1

Liliana L. Bove, Thomas W. Gruen

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2023 AMS Review – Sheth Foundation Doctoral Competition for Conceptual Articles attracted 55 entries from across the world. This editorial provides a brief history of the competition, describes the rationale for the competition, and the review and selection process. It offers a brief description of the conceptual contributions of each of the six winners of the competition, and it also lists the six runners-up. It concludes with the co-chairs’ general synthesis of the elements that distinguish a “winning” proposal, and they provide specific advice to entrants of future competitions.

查看原文本刊更多论文

2023年概念性论文博士竞赛的经验教训:识别、培养和发表

2023 AMS评审- Sheth基金会概念性论文博士竞赛吸引了来自世界各地的55个参赛作品。这篇社论提供了竞赛的简要历史，描述了竞赛的基本原理，以及审查和选择过程。它简要介绍了六位获胜者的概念贡献，并列出了六位亚军。最后，联合主席总结了区分“获胜”方案的要素，并为未来竞赛的参赛者提供了具体建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

AMS Review Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing

CiteScore

14.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication. The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.