The Suitability of Digital Video Surveillance and Multi-beam Sonar to Monitor Saltwater Crocodiles

IF 1.7 4区 物理与天体物理
Matthew Brien, Laurence Taplin, Richard Talmage, Simon Booth, Colby Bignell, Paul Beri, Peter Freeman, Michael Joyce
{"title":"The Suitability of Digital Video Surveillance and Multi-beam Sonar to Monitor Saltwater Crocodiles","authors":"Matthew Brien,&nbsp;Laurence Taplin,&nbsp;Richard Talmage,&nbsp;Simon Booth,&nbsp;Colby Bignell,&nbsp;Paul Beri,&nbsp;Peter Freeman,&nbsp;Michael Joyce","doi":"10.1007/s40857-020-00216-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite intensive management, the increasing conflict between humans and saltwater crocodiles in places such as Queensland, Australia, has led to the investigation of alternative techniques to improve public safety. The reliability of digital video surveillance systems (DV) placed above water and multi-beam sonar (sonar) placed under water to detect and monitor saltwater crocodiles was tested in a seminatural freshwater environment over a 2 h period (16:00–18:00 h). A total of 29 crocodiles were detected within the study area using DV, and 28 with sonar. One was obscured by a section of bank, and thus not visible on sonar. Of the 28 crocodiles detected by both methods, sonar recorded both entry and exit for all, while DV recorded both entry and exit for 15 crocodiles. The length of time that crocodiles were detected was longer on average for sonar (4 min 27 s) compared with DV (2 min 50 s). This reflected the time spent above (detected by sonar and DV) or below water (not detected by DV), as only sonar was able to detect crocodiles underwater. The use of sonar may provide a valuable management tool for detecting and monitoring saltwater crocodiles in areas frequented by people (e.g. beaches, boat ramps, upper freshwater areas) where there is a high chance of a negative interaction.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54355,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40857-020-00216-z","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics Australia","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40857-020-00216-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite intensive management, the increasing conflict between humans and saltwater crocodiles in places such as Queensland, Australia, has led to the investigation of alternative techniques to improve public safety. The reliability of digital video surveillance systems (DV) placed above water and multi-beam sonar (sonar) placed under water to detect and monitor saltwater crocodiles was tested in a seminatural freshwater environment over a 2 h period (16:00–18:00 h). A total of 29 crocodiles were detected within the study area using DV, and 28 with sonar. One was obscured by a section of bank, and thus not visible on sonar. Of the 28 crocodiles detected by both methods, sonar recorded both entry and exit for all, while DV recorded both entry and exit for 15 crocodiles. The length of time that crocodiles were detected was longer on average for sonar (4 min 27 s) compared with DV (2 min 50 s). This reflected the time spent above (detected by sonar and DV) or below water (not detected by DV), as only sonar was able to detect crocodiles underwater. The use of sonar may provide a valuable management tool for detecting and monitoring saltwater crocodiles in areas frequented by people (e.g. beaches, boat ramps, upper freshwater areas) where there is a high chance of a negative interaction.

Abstract Image

数字视频监控与多波束声纳监测咸水鳄的适用性
尽管进行了密集的管理,但在澳大利亚昆士兰等地,人类与咸水鳄之间的冲突越来越多,这促使人们开始研究改善公共安全的替代技术。在半自然淡水环境中(16:00-18:00 h),对水上数字视频监控系统(DV)和水下多波束声纳(sonar)检测和监测咸水鳄鱼的可靠性进行了2 h的测试。在研究区域内,使用DV检测到29条鳄鱼,使用声纳检测到28条鳄鱼。其中一艘船被一段河岸遮住了,因此在声纳上看不见。在两种方法检测到的28条鳄鱼中,声纳记录了所有鳄鱼的进出,而DV记录了15条鳄鱼的进出。声纳探测鳄鱼的平均时间(4分27秒)比DV(2分50秒)要长。这反映了水面上(声纳和DV都能探测到)或水下(DV不能探测到)所花费的时间,因为只有声纳才能探测到水下的鳄鱼。在人们经常出没的地区(例如海滩、船坡道、上游淡水地区),使用声纳可以提供一种有价值的管理工具,用于探测和监测咸水鳄鱼,这些地区很可能存在负面的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acoustics Australia
Acoustics Australia ACOUSTICS-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Acoustics Australia, the journal of the Australian Acoustical Society, has been publishing high quality research and technical papers in all areas of acoustics since commencement in 1972. The target audience for the journal includes both researchers and practitioners. It aims to publish papers and technical notes that are relevant to current acoustics and of interest to members of the Society. These include but are not limited to: Architectural and Building Acoustics, Environmental Noise, Underwater Acoustics, Engineering Noise and Vibration Control, Occupational Noise Management, Hearing, Musical Acoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信