Carl Laverdiere , Julien Montreuil , Matthew Zakaria , Thierry Pauyo , Mitchell Bernstein , Yasser Bouklouch , Edward J. Harvey
{"title":"Forearm fasciotomies for acute compartment syndrome: Big data analysis","authors":"Carl Laverdiere , Julien Montreuil , Matthew Zakaria , Thierry Pauyo , Mitchell Bernstein , Yasser Bouklouch , Edward J. Harvey","doi":"10.1016/j.orthop.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the incidence, risk factors, demographics, and association in the analysis of acute compartment syndrome of the forearm.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of the Trauma Quality Programs data from the American College of Surgeons. This includes 120,556 patients who sustained a forearm fracture from 2015 to 2018 (4 calendar years). The main outcome measurements are fasciotomies performed after sustaining a forearm fracture, thus suggesting acute compartment syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fasciotomies were performed in 1.6% of all forearm fractures. Open fractures were 5 times more likely to lead to fasciotomies. Being a male was associated with an increased likelihood of fasciotomies of 64%. Complex fractures (OTA type C) exhibited 74% stronger likelihood of fasciotomies compared to simple fractures. Patients with a history of substance abuse disorder (SAD) were 45% more likely to undergo a fasciotomy compared to patient with no SAD. Multiple other factors were addressed while controlling for cofounders.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This big data analysis provided a holistic perspective on the risk factors, demographics, and clinical association of ACS in the forearm. There is a clear need for a gold standard diagnosis for ACS to provide better care for the patients: whether it is continuous pressure monitoring, validated biomarkers, or other biomarkers.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>III, retrospective database cohort study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100994,"journal":{"name":"Orthoplastic Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"Pages 27-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthoplastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X23000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the incidence, risk factors, demographics, and association in the analysis of acute compartment syndrome of the forearm.
Methods
A retrospective review of the Trauma Quality Programs data from the American College of Surgeons. This includes 120,556 patients who sustained a forearm fracture from 2015 to 2018 (4 calendar years). The main outcome measurements are fasciotomies performed after sustaining a forearm fracture, thus suggesting acute compartment syndrome.
Results
Fasciotomies were performed in 1.6% of all forearm fractures. Open fractures were 5 times more likely to lead to fasciotomies. Being a male was associated with an increased likelihood of fasciotomies of 64%. Complex fractures (OTA type C) exhibited 74% stronger likelihood of fasciotomies compared to simple fractures. Patients with a history of substance abuse disorder (SAD) were 45% more likely to undergo a fasciotomy compared to patient with no SAD. Multiple other factors were addressed while controlling for cofounders.
Conclusion
This big data analysis provided a holistic perspective on the risk factors, demographics, and clinical association of ACS in the forearm. There is a clear need for a gold standard diagnosis for ACS to provide better care for the patients: whether it is continuous pressure monitoring, validated biomarkers, or other biomarkers.