Testing higher and infinite degrees of stochastic dominance for small samples: A Bayesian approach

IF 0.8 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Mariusz Górajski
{"title":"Testing higher and infinite degrees of stochastic dominance for small samples: A Bayesian approach","authors":"Mariusz Górajski","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2023.106102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This study proposes a distribution-free Bayesian procedure that detects infinite degrees of stochastic dominance (SD</span><span><math><mi>∞</mi></math></span>) between two random outcomes and then seeks a finite degree <span><math><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>≥</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></math></span> of stochastic dominance (SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span><span>). Based on small samples, we construct four-choice Bayesian tests by combining an encompassing prior Bayesian model with the Dirichlet process priors that discriminate between SD</span><span><math><mi>∞</mi></math></span> and SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span> of one random variable over the other with non-dominance or equality between them. We use Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the novel Bayesian tests for SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span> and SD<span><math><mi>∞</mi></math></span> and compare them to the subsampling and bootstrap significance tests for SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span>. Our simulation shows that the Bayesian tests for SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span> outperform the significance tests for small samples, especially for detecting non-stochastic dominance. This study shows that the test for SD<span><math><mi>∞</mi></math></span> is an accurate decision-making tool when using small samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50039,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837582300071X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes a distribution-free Bayesian procedure that detects infinite degrees of stochastic dominance (SD) between two random outcomes and then seeks a finite degree k1 of stochastic dominance (SDk). Based on small samples, we construct four-choice Bayesian tests by combining an encompassing prior Bayesian model with the Dirichlet process priors that discriminate between SD and SDk of one random variable over the other with non-dominance or equality between them. We use Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the novel Bayesian tests for SDk and SD and compare them to the subsampling and bootstrap significance tests for SDk. Our simulation shows that the Bayesian tests for SDk outperform the significance tests for small samples, especially for detecting non-stochastic dominance. This study shows that the test for SD is an accurate decision-making tool when using small samples.

测试小样本的更高和无限程度的随机优势:贝叶斯方法
该研究提出了一种无分布的贝叶斯过程,该过程检测两个随机结果之间的无限随机优势度(SD∞),然后寻求随机优势度的有限度k≥1(SDk)。基于小样本,我们通过将包含先验贝叶斯模型与狄利克雷过程先验相结合来构建四选择贝叶斯检验,该先验在一个随机变量的SD∞和SDk之间存在非显性或相等性的情况下区分另一个随机变元。我们使用蒙特卡罗模拟来评估SDk和SD∞的新贝叶斯检验,并将其与SDk的子采样和自举显著性检验进行比较。我们的模拟表明,SDk的贝叶斯检验优于小样本的显著性检验,尤其是在检测非随机优势时。研究表明,当使用小样本时,SD∞测试是一种准确的决策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference offers itself as a multifaceted and all-inclusive bridge between classical aspects of statistics and probability, and the emerging interdisciplinary aspects that have a potential of revolutionizing the subject. While we maintain our traditional strength in statistical inference, design, classical probability, and large sample methods, we also have a far more inclusive and broadened scope to keep up with the new problems that confront us as statisticians, mathematicians, and scientists. We publish high quality articles in all branches of statistics, probability, discrete mathematics, machine learning, and bioinformatics. We also especially welcome well written and up to date review articles on fundamental themes of statistics, probability, machine learning, and general biostatistics. Thoughtful letters to the editors, interesting problems in need of a solution, and short notes carrying an element of elegance or beauty are equally welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信