Forest use suitability: Towards decision-making-oriented sustainable management of forest ecosystem services

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Goran Krsnik , Keith M. Reynolds , Philip Murphy , Steve Paplanus , Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo , José Ramón González Olabarria
{"title":"Forest use suitability: Towards decision-making-oriented sustainable management of forest ecosystem services","authors":"Goran Krsnik ,&nbsp;Keith M. Reynolds ,&nbsp;Philip Murphy ,&nbsp;Steve Paplanus ,&nbsp;Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo ,&nbsp;José Ramón González Olabarria","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Management of forest lands considering multi-functional approaches is the basis to sustain or enhance the provision of specific benefits, while minimizing negative impacts to the environment. Defining a desired management itinerary to a forest depends on a variety of factors, including the forest type, its ecological characteristics, and the social and economic needs of local communities. A strategic assessment of the forest use suitability (FUS) (namely productive, protective, conservation-oriented, social and multi-functional) at regional level, based on the provision of forest ecosystem services and trade-offs between FUS alternatives, can be used to develop management strategies that are tailored to the specific needs and conditions of the forest. The present study assesses the provision of multiple forest ecosystem services and employs a decision model to identify the FUS that supports the most present and productive ecosystem services in each stand in Catalonia. For this purpose, we apply the latest version of the Ecosystem Management Decision Support (EMDS) system, a spatially oriented decision support system that provides accurate results for multi-criteria management. We evaluate 32 metrics and 12 associated ecosystem services indicators to represent the spatial reality of the region. According to the results, the dominant primary use suitability is social, followed by protective and productive. Nevertheless, final assignment of uses is not straightforward and requires an exhaustive analysis of trade-offs between all alternative options, in many cases identifying flexible outcomes, and increasing the representativeness of multi-functional use. The assignment of forest use suitability aims to significantly improve the definition of the most adequate management strategy to be applied.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 414-427"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683923000512","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management of forest lands considering multi-functional approaches is the basis to sustain or enhance the provision of specific benefits, while minimizing negative impacts to the environment. Defining a desired management itinerary to a forest depends on a variety of factors, including the forest type, its ecological characteristics, and the social and economic needs of local communities. A strategic assessment of the forest use suitability (FUS) (namely productive, protective, conservation-oriented, social and multi-functional) at regional level, based on the provision of forest ecosystem services and trade-offs between FUS alternatives, can be used to develop management strategies that are tailored to the specific needs and conditions of the forest. The present study assesses the provision of multiple forest ecosystem services and employs a decision model to identify the FUS that supports the most present and productive ecosystem services in each stand in Catalonia. For this purpose, we apply the latest version of the Ecosystem Management Decision Support (EMDS) system, a spatially oriented decision support system that provides accurate results for multi-criteria management. We evaluate 32 metrics and 12 associated ecosystem services indicators to represent the spatial reality of the region. According to the results, the dominant primary use suitability is social, followed by protective and productive. Nevertheless, final assignment of uses is not straightforward and requires an exhaustive analysis of trade-offs between all alternative options, in many cases identifying flexible outcomes, and increasing the representativeness of multi-functional use. The assignment of forest use suitability aims to significantly improve the definition of the most adequate management strategy to be applied.

Abstract Image

森林利用适宜性:面向决策的森林生态系统服务可持续管理
考虑到多功能方法的林地管理是维持或加强提供具体利益,同时尽量减少对环境的负面影响的基础。确定理想的森林管理路线取决于各种因素,包括森林类型、生态特征以及当地社区的社会和经济需求。根据森林生态系统服务的提供和森林利用适宜性备选方案之间的权衡,在区域一级对森林利用适宜性(即生产性、保护性、面向养护、社会性和多功能)进行战略评估,可用于制定适合森林具体需要和条件的管理战略。本研究评估了多种森林生态系统服务的提供,并采用决策模型来确定在加泰罗尼亚每个林分中支持最现有和最具生产力的生态系统服务的FUS。为此,我们应用了最新版本的生态系统管理决策支持(EMDS)系统,这是一个面向空间的决策支持系统,可为多标准管理提供准确的结果。我们评估了32个指标和12个相关的生态系统服务指标,以代表该地区的空间现实。结果表明,主要用途是社会性,其次是保护性和生产性。然而,用途的最终分配并非直截了当,需要对所有备选方案之间的权衡进行详尽的分析,在许多情况下确定灵活的结果,并增加多功能用途的代表性。分配森林利用适宜性的目的是大大改进所适用的最适当管理战略的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信